The grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling) plants subjected to water deficit were studied for changes in relative water content (RWC), leaf dry mass, contents of chlorophyll (Chl), total leaf proteins, free amino acids, and proline, and activities of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPC), nitrate reductase (NR), and protease. In water-stressed plants RWC, leaf dry matter, Chl content, net photosynthetic rate (P N ), and RuBPC and NR activities were significantly decreased. The total leaf protein content also declined with increase in the accumulation of free amino acids. Concurrently, the protease activity in the tissues was also increased. A significant two-fold increase in proline content was recorded.Additional key words: amino acids; chlorophyll; net photosynthetic rate; nitrate reductase; proline; protease; relative water content; ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase.---Water stress has a multifaceted effect on plant growth and metabolism (Hsiao 1973). Under stress, leaves close their stomata, and this is generally believed to be the cause of reduced carbon gain under periods of drought (Kaiser et al. 1981). Water stress affects not only the carbon metabolism but also nitrogen metabolism. During water stress nitrate reductase (NR) activity is lost more rapidly than most enzymes (Huffaker et al. 1970). The other enzymes of the pathway of nitrate assimilation, nitrite reductase and glutamine synthetase (Taylor et al. 1982), are relatively unaffected. Huffaker et al. (1970) suggested that a rapid loss of NR activity could be part of a biochemical adaptation to water deficit; shutting off the nitrate assimilation pathway at the first step would reduce energy requirements during periods of stress and prevent accumulation of nitrite and ammonium.Water stress is the most important factor limiting grapevine growth in the Mediterranean area (Gomez del Campo et al. 2000, Flexas et al. 2002. Previous studies on the photosynthetic response to drought under field conditions showed that stomatal closure is an early response, which is almost matched by decreases in CO 2 assimilation. This response becomes progressively greater through summer, as soil water availability decreases and also non-stomatal effects appear (Escalona et al. 1997). The purpose of the present study was the investigation of the effects of water deficit on physiological responses in grapevine.One-year-old grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling) plants were grown in 20 000-cm 3 pots containing soil : sand : peat : vermiculite (3 : 1 : 3 : 3) in glasshouse [26/30-16/20 o C day/night temperature, photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 1 200-1 500 µmol m -2 s -1 , 14/10 h light/dark cycle, and relative humidity between 65 and 70 %], and then divided into two uniform groups of ten pots each. The first group (control) continued to receive daily irrigation in order to maintain the soil water at the field capacity while in the second group (water deficit) irrigation was stopped. Measurements were made 10 d after the irrigation was stopped...