2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembling and diversifying social contexts of recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our methodology involves comparison of the Australian texts with the Canadian texts to articulate the two realities of alcohol. Inspired by recent critical research comparing drug policy and practice across countries (e.g., Fraser, 2016; Fraser & Ekendahl, 2018; Moore et al, 2015; Sultan & Duff, 2021), we chose Australian and Canadian texts because they offer several general points of similarity and difference. In Esping-Andersen’s (1990) highly cited typology of “welfare-state regimes,” Australia and Canada’s regimes are both characterized as liberal-welfare.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methodology involves comparison of the Australian texts with the Canadian texts to articulate the two realities of alcohol. Inspired by recent critical research comparing drug policy and practice across countries (e.g., Fraser, 2016; Fraser & Ekendahl, 2018; Moore et al, 2015; Sultan & Duff, 2021), we chose Australian and Canadian texts because they offer several general points of similarity and difference. In Esping-Andersen’s (1990) highly cited typology of “welfare-state regimes,” Australia and Canada’s regimes are both characterized as liberal-welfare.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new social identity guides self-definition and behaviour towards pro-recovery outcomes. However, this view of recovery has been criticised for prioritising individual agency in the recovery process (Fomiatti et al , 2019; Sultan and Duff, 2021). Fomiatti et al (2019) describe this view of recovery as the “improvable self” to highlight how it neglects the role of political, economic and other social forces that shape recovery.…”
Section: The Debate: Stigmatising Language In the Alcohol And Other D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fomiatti et al (2019) describe this view of recovery as the “improvable self” to highlight how it neglects the role of political, economic and other social forces that shape recovery. Similarly, Sultan and Duff (2021) use assemblage thinking to suggest that the individual is among a complex network of connections that constitute and enable recovery.…”
Section: The Debate: Stigmatising Language In the Alcohol And Other D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different iterations of this theoretical perspective have inspired recent substance use research (Bohling, 2015; Dilkes-Frayne, 2014; Sultan & Duff, 2021), but few, if any, studies have applied it to women’s substance use. This approach could facilitate understanding of drug harms among women in Africa, especially when used to unpack the effects of macro-structural factors.…”
Section: Study Context and Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%