2016
DOI: 10.1525/jps.2016.45.4.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembling the Fabric of Life: When Settler Colonialism Becomes Development

Abstract: This article brings attention to the political geography of settler colonialism and the ways in which the Palestinian built environment materializes in space, consolidating uneven and racialized landscapes. It argues that settler-colonial space is intimately related to the building of infrastructures structured by development and humanitarian practices. More specifically, the discussion explores how roadscapes are materially and symbolically constructed; it also examines the ways in which development, rather t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Embedded in physical infrastructure, racialized biopolitics, and bureaucratic institutionalization, settler colonialism is part and parcel of the physical and imagined environments of this region (Abu Hatoum, 2021, this issue; Bishara et al., 2021, this issue; Braverman, 2021, this issue; see also Alatout, 2006; Salamanca, 2016; Stamatopoulou-Robbins, 2019; Weizman, 2007; Zureik, 2015). The Separation Wall, one of the more visible materialities in this place, both creates violence and also serves to obscure it (Bishara, 2020).…”
Section: The Interface Of Environmental Justice and Settler Colonialimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedded in physical infrastructure, racialized biopolitics, and bureaucratic institutionalization, settler colonialism is part and parcel of the physical and imagined environments of this region (Abu Hatoum, 2021, this issue; Bishara et al., 2021, this issue; Braverman, 2021, this issue; see also Alatout, 2006; Salamanca, 2016; Stamatopoulou-Robbins, 2019; Weizman, 2007; Zureik, 2015). The Separation Wall, one of the more visible materialities in this place, both creates violence and also serves to obscure it (Bishara, 2020).…”
Section: The Interface Of Environmental Justice and Settler Colonialimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on geographers' longstanding interrogation of planning in territorial dispossession and geopolitics, recent infrastructure and planning literature has considerably radicalized this focus through engagement with settler colonial studies (Braier & Yacobi, ; Cowen, ; Curley, , ; Salamanca, , ; Porter & Yiftachel, , p. 177; Yacobi & Tzfadia, ). Rutland (, p. 1) situates urban planning as a “world‐altering instrument of power and race,” showing how settlement and planning practices are predicated on large‐scale violence against and displacement of indigenous peoples and other racialized populations and how their presence is erased from the historical record.…”
Section: Population Management/biopoliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 We are instead left to encounter the Wall’s imposing structure as a sightseeing highlight, and tour participants photograph themselves against the backdrop of its extensive graffiti and get the opportunity to add their own scrawls. This performative engagement turns it into an exotic icon of “conflict” in an abstract sense rather than conveying any understanding about how it functions as a mechanism of settler colonial control (see Alatout, 2009; Salamanca, 2016; Weizman, 2007). 15 Without this context, the spectacle of the Wall’s material existence distances it from the regime of Israeli control operating throughout the West Bank and not merely at the boundary between Israel and Palestinian territory that the Wall is presumed to constitute.…”
Section: The West Bankmentioning
confidence: 99%