2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembling the Marine Metagenome, One Cell at a Time

Abstract: The difficulty associated with the cultivation of most microorganisms and the complexity of natural microbial assemblages, such as marine plankton or human microbiome, hinder genome reconstruction of representative taxa using cultivation or metagenomic approaches. Here we used an alternative, single cell sequencing approach to obtain high-quality genome assemblies of two uncultured, numerically significant marine microorganisms. We employed fluorescence-activated cell sorting and multiple displacement amplific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
278
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(292 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
8
278
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, they had more paralogous families and a larger percent of genes in such families (Table 1; Figure 1). The percentage of genes in paralogous families follows an already recognized linear relationship with genome size for a large selection of bacteria ( Figure 1; Pushker et al, 2004;Woyke et al, 2009). Gene duplication and subsequent modifications to carry out novel functions by paralogous proteins is a well-known mechanism of bacterial evolution (review in Andersson and Hughes, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…First, they had more paralogous families and a larger percent of genes in such families (Table 1; Figure 1). The percentage of genes in paralogous families follows an already recognized linear relationship with genome size for a large selection of bacteria ( Figure 1; Pushker et al, 2004;Woyke et al, 2009). Gene duplication and subsequent modifications to carry out novel functions by paralogous proteins is a well-known mechanism of bacterial evolution (review in Andersson and Hughes, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…MDA reactions are sensitive to DNA contamination present in the sample, reagents or contamination introduced through sample handling. The effect of DNA contamination can be controlled by establishing clean cell-sorting procedures 12,20,24,26 , decontaminating commercially available MDA reagents 1,20,23 , expressing a custom ultrapure Phi29 enzyme 27 or by using commercial precleaned MDA kits that are specifically designed for single-cell templates. Volume reduction can also limit the impact of reagent contamination (Box 1).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… crItIcal step Although previous reports suggest debranching of the MDA products with S1 nuclease before sequencing 15 , we do not recommend this step. Our previous results suggest that S1 debranching has no effect on the chimera rate 12 , and we routinely sequence and phylogenetically screen single-cell MDA products without debranching.  pause poInt The amplified DNA is ready for phylogenetic screening and sequencing (Steps 24-30), and it can be stored for several months at −80 °C.…”
Section: |mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, these assemblies are actually consensus genomes derived from closely related species or strains, which makes many interesting analyses of genomes and populations impossible. Single-cell sequencing, enabled by the whole-genome amplification technique of multiple displacement amplification (MDA) (Dean et al 2001(Dean et al , 2002, has allowed researchers to sequence and assemble a significant portion of a single genome (Zhang et al 2006;Woyke et al 2009). However, MDA from a single cell suffers from amplification bias.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%