2021
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembly bias in quadratic bias parameters of dark matter halos from forward modeling

Abstract: We use the forward modeling approach to galaxy clustering combined with the likelihood from the effective-field theory of large-scale structure to measure assembly bias, i.e. the dependence of halo bias on properties beyond the total mass, in the linear (b1) and second order bias parameters (b2 and bK 2) of dark matter halos in N-body simulations. This is the first time that assembly bias in the tidal bias parameter bK 2 is measured. We focus on three standard halo propertie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 any obvious systematic trend with the value of Λ. Perhaps the main noteworthy difference is a noticeable decrease in precision for the L box ≈ 800Mpc box with Λ = 0.1h/Mpc, suggesting that even this bigger box begins to loose some constraining power on b K 2 when this cutoff is employed (our companion paper [62] shows indeed that the signal-to-noise on b K 2 for Λ = 0.1h/Mpc is higher in a larger box with L box = 2400Mpc/h).…”
Section: Convergence Tests On the Cutoff λmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 any obvious systematic trend with the value of Λ. Perhaps the main noteworthy difference is a noticeable decrease in precision for the L box ≈ 800Mpc box with Λ = 0.1h/Mpc, suggesting that even this bigger box begins to loose some constraining power on b K 2 when this cutoff is employed (our companion paper [62] shows indeed that the signal-to-noise on b K 2 for Λ = 0.1h/Mpc is higher in a larger box with L box = 2400Mpc/h).…”
Section: Convergence Tests On the Cutoff λmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…4 show also an intriguing feature on the b K 2 (b 1 ) relation of the stellar mass selected objects at z = 2 and z = 3, which exhibits a non-monotonic dependence on b 1 that varies steeply in some b 1 intervals; this is especially noticeable for the z = 3 galaxy results (lower right panel). With just a single, relatively small-volume simulation, it is hard to rule out this as due to numerical noise, but we mention it explicitly anyway in light of the results in our companion paper [62] where similar (and higher signal-to-noise) features are also observed in halo assembly bias, i.e. when halos in gravity-only (larger-volume) simulations are selected by properties other than their total mass (namely concentration, angular momentum and shape).…”
Section: Galaxy Bias As a Function Of Simulated Galaxy Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It demonstrates that PNG constraints can be significantly improved with a better knowledge of bias parameters, which motivates further work on their calibration with simulations, e.g. along the lines of [73,74].…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We repeat this procedure for all the fields appearing in Eq. (2.10) (see also [44,45] for a recent study of halo and galaxy bias using this method).…”
Section: The Eft Likelihoodmentioning
confidence: 99%