2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.04.482684
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembly of functional diversity in an oceanic island flora

Abstract: Oceanic island floras are well-known for their morphological peculiarities and exhibit striking examples of trait evolution. These morphological shifts are commonly attributed to insularity and thought to be shaped by biogeographical processes and evolutionary histories of oceanic islands. However, the mechanisms through which biogeography and evolution have shaped the distribution and diversity of plant functional traits remain unclear. Here, we describe the functional trait space of an oceanic island flora (… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(67 reference statements)
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…speciation is non-adaptive on the Canary Islands as endemic species only marginally increase functional diversity. A recent study on Tenerife concurs with our results by showing that cladogenetic plant species are tightly packed in trait space(Barajas-Barbosa et al, 2022). A relaxed competition on oceanic islands may allow genetic drift to become dominant over adaptive processes(Stuessy et al, 2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…speciation is non-adaptive on the Canary Islands as endemic species only marginally increase functional diversity. A recent study on Tenerife concurs with our results by showing that cladogenetic plant species are tightly packed in trait space(Barajas-Barbosa et al, 2022). A relaxed competition on oceanic islands may allow genetic drift to become dominant over adaptive processes(Stuessy et al, 2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, the Canary Islands are a hotspot of insular woody species and succulent plants (Irl et al, 2020;Barajas-Barbosa et al, 2022;Zizka et al, 2022), which suggests that a large proportion of the Canary Islands flora could be resilient to the predicted climatic changes. Nonetheless, with ongoing climate change, a net loss of species with unique functions seems inevitable, leading to a functional homogenisation and a possible deterioration of ecosystem stability (Olden et al, 2004;Clavel et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, insular woody and succulent species may have an advantage in a climate that is warmer and drier than today on the Canary Islands. Indeed, the Canary Islands are a hotspot of insular woody species and succulent plants (Barajas‐Barbosa et al, 2022; Irl et al, 2020; Zizka et al, 2022), which suggests that a large proportion of the Canary Islands flora could be able to cope with the predicted climatic changes. Nonetheless, with ongoing climate change, a net loss of species with unique functions seems inevitable, leading to functional homogenisation and impoverishment, and a possible deterioration of ecosystem stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main goal was to study the relationship between multiple diversity facets and forest productivity in two areas with similar climates but contrasting biogeographic contexts. We selected the Canary Islands archipelago (hereafter ‘the Canaries’) as our focal oceanic archipelago because its flora has been extensively studied (Acebes‐Ginovés et al., 2010; Barajas Barbosa et al., 2023) and it has broad environmental gradients in elevation and aridity (Ashmole & Ashmole, 2016; del Arco Aguilar & Rodríguez Delgado, 2018). Located in the Atlantic Ocean off the northwestern tip of Africa, the Canaries are an archipelago of volcanic origin formed progressively starting around 60 Ma (Troll & Carracedo, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we expected (1) positive multifaceted biodiversity‐productivity relationships due to complementarity acting on both island and mainland forests, with phylogenetic diversity having a stronger influence on productivity than taxonomic or functional diversity as it can estimate the functional trait space of a community and also reflect species interactions (Srivastava et al., 2012), and phylogenetic diversity has been found to promote ecosystem functions and stability (Cadotte et al., 2012; van der Plas, 2019; Venail et al., 2015). We hypothesised that the magnitude of multifaceted biodiversity‐productivity relationships differ between biogeographic contexts, with stronger relationships on islands because a large proportion of island biota evolved in these ecosystems and therefore developed specific traits to more efficiently use limited resources or to persist in harsh environments (Barajas Barbosa et al., 2023; Emerson & Gillespie, 2008); (2) environmental conditions, that is climate and soil properties, influence productivity on island and mainland forests, as bioclimatic variables and soil nutrients have been shown to strongly influence plant diversity (Kreft & Jetz, 2007; Lambers et al., 2011) and productivity (following the species‐energy hypothesis); (3) the number of individuals positively influences productivity on island and mainland forests, as a higher number of individuals is expected to host a more biodiverse community (following the more‐individuals hypothesis), which subsequently is expected to yield higher productivity (Gaston, 2000; Srivastava & Lawton, 1998); and (4) non‐native species potentially influence productivity in both island and mainland forests, with the effect being stronger and positive on islands as non‐native species likely perform different functions than native species (Rothstein et al., 2004; Vitousek et al., 1996). However, as the Canary Islands forests may not have been impacted by non‐native species as extensively as other oceanic islands (Fernández‐Palacios et al., 2023), the influence of non‐native species on ecosystem functioning may be similar to that of mainland forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%