Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the output neurons of the retina, allow us to perceive our visual environment. RGCs respond to rod/cone input through the retinal circuitry, however, a small population of RGCs are in addition intrinsically photosensitive (ipRGCs) and project to unique 1 0 targets in the brain to modulate a broad range of subconscious visual behaviors such as pupil constriction and circadian photoentrainment. Despite the discovery of ipRGCs nearly two decades ago, there is still little information about how or if conventional RGCs (non-ipRGCs) target ipRGC-recipient nuclei to influence subconscious visual behavior. Using a dual recombinase color strategy, we showed that conventional RGCs innervate many subconscious ipRGC-recipient nuclei, apart from the suprachiasmatic nucleus. We revealed previously unrecognized stratification patterns of retinal innervation from ipRGCs and conventional RGCs in the ventral portion of the lateral geniculate nucleus. Further, we found that the percent innervation of ipRGCs and conventional RGCs across ipsi-and contralateral nuclei differ. Our data provide a blueprint to understand how conventional RGCs and ipRGCs innervate different 2 0 brain regions to influence subconscious visual behaviors. 3 0 forming visual behaviors (Altimus et al., information about how or if conventional RGCs (non-ipRGCs) can influence subconscious visual behaviors. To address this knowledge gap, we must first delineate whether conventional RGCs innervate non-image forming nuclei.To determine if conventional RGCs innervate non-image forming nuclei (Ecker et al., 2010; Hattar et al., 2002 Hattar et al., , 2006 Li and Schmidt, 2018; Morin and Studholme, 2014), we utilized a dual recombinase two color strategy to delineate, in the same animal, how ipRGCs and conventional RGCs converge and diverge in ipRGC-recipient brain regions. We found that the master clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is exclusively innervated by ipRGCs, as was previously 4 0 implicated (Hattar et al., 2006). However, the SCN was the exception to the rule, as most ipRGC-recipient areas received substantial projections from conventional RGCs. The dual color strategy allowed us to differentiate areas where conventional RGCs and ipRGCs converge and intermingle, from brain regions where they form completely distinct subdivisions. Specifically, we found that conventional RGCs and ipRGCs innervate distinct subdivisions of the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus (vLGN). As we found in the SCN, the vLGN core region receives exclusive ipRGC input. Furthermore, we found differences in the percent innervation between the ipsi-and contralateral patterns of conventional RGCs and ipRGCs. Our results provide a basis for understanding how ipRGCs and conventional RGC modulate non-image forming behaviors for normal function. 5 0