2012 IEEE 62nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ectc.2012.6248883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembly process and reliability assessment of TSV/RDL/IPD interposer with multi-chip-stacking for 3D IC integration SiP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most significant advantage of the proposed fabrication flow is that an intact TSV insulation layer with excellent integrity and conformity can be obtained, resulting in an ultra-low leakage current. As shown in figure 4(a), there are three common types of insulation defects that are prone to occur during the conventional interposer manufacturing process, which will lead to three different TSV leakage modes [21,22]. The first type of defect is caused by Cu overburden CMP, this will lead to a short circuit between the Si substrate and the frontside RDL.…”
Section: Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most significant advantage of the proposed fabrication flow is that an intact TSV insulation layer with excellent integrity and conformity can be obtained, resulting in an ultra-low leakage current. As shown in figure 4(a), there are three common types of insulation defects that are prone to occur during the conventional interposer manufacturing process, which will lead to three different TSV leakage modes [21,22]. The first type of defect is caused by Cu overburden CMP, this will lead to a short circuit between the Si substrate and the frontside RDL.…”
Section: Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…insulation layer damage caused by Cu overburden CMP, Cu-Si short circuit occurred in backside TSV reveal). Some improved techniques have been developed to offer a better insulation layer [20][21][22][23]. However, these techniques make the manufacturing process more complicated, and it is still very hard to avoid the defects completely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next is chip-to-wafer (C2W) bonding, for example [18,19], i.e., the micro bumped memory chip is bonded (either by natural reflow or thermal compression) to the TSV wafer with the carrier. After face-to-back C2W bonding, the carrier wafer is debonded from the TSV wafer.…”
Section: Fig 3 Critical Steps and Ownerships For (Face-to-face) Widementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test vehicle can be degenerated to the case of: (a) wide I/O memory if there is not the memory-chip stacking nor the TSVs in the mechanical/thermal chips and the interposer is either an logic, microprocessor, or SoC; (b) wide I/O DRAM if there are not mechanical and thermal chips and the interposer is a logic chip; and (c) wide I/O interface ifthere is not the memory-chip stacking and there is not any TSV in the thermal/ mechanical chips. Thus, the core enabling technologies (such as via etching, dielectric, barrier and seed layers deposition, via filling, CMP, thin-wafer handling, electrical and thermal design and test of TSVs, wafer bumping of ultra finepitch lead-free microbumps, fluxless C2W bonding, electronmigration of microbumps, and reliability of microbump assemblies) developed[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] with this test vehicle are very useful and can have very broad applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%