1995
DOI: 10.2307/3545686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembly Rules, Null Models, and Trait Dispersion: New Questions from Old Patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

67
863
12
15

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 780 publications
(957 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
67
863
12
15
Order By: Relevance
“…C−, three cuts per year; C+, six cuts per year; N− and N+ representing 12 and 36 g N m −2 year −1 , respectively. FT and FD indices were used to infer the effect of habitat-filtering and niche differentiation processes on species abundance, respectively which is, according to the authors, in agreement with the theoretical pattern, predicting "a shift from biotically-driven divergence to abiotically-driven convergence with increasing spatial scale of observation" (Weiher and Keddy 1995;Holdaway and Sparrow 2006). Similarly to the spatial scale, the pattern of convergence and divergence has been theorized to depend on the severity of environment.…”
Section: Which Assembly Process For Which Conditions?supporting
confidence: 54%
“…C−, three cuts per year; C+, six cuts per year; N− and N+ representing 12 and 36 g N m −2 year −1 , respectively. FT and FD indices were used to infer the effect of habitat-filtering and niche differentiation processes on species abundance, respectively which is, according to the authors, in agreement with the theoretical pattern, predicting "a shift from biotically-driven divergence to abiotically-driven convergence with increasing spatial scale of observation" (Weiher and Keddy 1995;Holdaway and Sparrow 2006). Similarly to the spatial scale, the pattern of convergence and divergence has been theorized to depend on the severity of environment.…”
Section: Which Assembly Process For Which Conditions?supporting
confidence: 54%
“…A general model of how community assembly might vary with scale and along gradients made the following predictions [25]: (i) community assembly should be neutral where both competitive adversity and environmental adversity are weak, (ii) trait overdispersion should be limited to small spatial scales over which species actually interact, and (iii) as scale increases, patterns of trait overdispersion should first become increasingly neutral and then should shift to trait underdispersion/convergence. This can be thought of as a pattern of trait overdispersion within a certain community type (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then collected aboveground biomass for all plant species contained within the 0.7 × 1.7 m area, and determined the dry mass of each species (Peltzer et al 2009). We also collected fresh foliage of 40 plant species (14 native species and 26 non-native species) to measure foliar N and P concentrations in order to facilitate trait-based interpretation of community divergence (Weiher and Keddy 1995;Shipley et al 2006;Ackerly and Cornwell 2007). Together, the 40 species comprised >99 % of the total aboveground biomass, and the 14 native species also comprised >99 % of the total native aboveground biomass in the system.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all local communities are randomly assembled, however (Götzenberger et al 2012;Rajaniemi et al 2012). Some species may modify local habitat conditions upon arrival, and consequently influence the kind of species that can subsequently establish, facilitating some species with certain ecological traits, while inhibiting others with other traits (Weiher and Keddy 1995;Grime 1998;Lepš et al 2001;Fukami et al 2005). If so, local communities that vary stochastically in the timing of the arrival of key species can diverge in species composition, resulting in higher beta diversity than expected solely from environmental filtering and otherwise random assembly (Chase 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%