2000
DOI: 10.15760/etd.5732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing a Fluorescence Spectroscopy Method for In-Situ Microbial Drinking Water Quality

Abstract: Waterborne disease is a significant contributor to the global burden of disease, in particular among high-risk populations in developing nations. State-of-the-art methods for the enumeration of microbial pathogens in drinking water sources have important limitations, including high initial cost, 24-48 hour delays in results, high staffing and facility requirements, and training requirements which all become especially problematic in the developing nation context.A number of alternative approaches to microbial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differentiating the extraction points shows that the correlation is significantly higher for the effluent samples (R 2 = 0.95) than for the Considering all samples, the coefficient of determination is R 2 = 0.75. This result is largely in line with the literature values [94,95]. Differentiating the extraction points shows that the correlation is significantly higher for the effluent samples (R 2 = 0.95) than for the influent samples (R 2 = 0.19).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Differentiating the extraction points shows that the correlation is significantly higher for the effluent samples (R 2 = 0.95) than for the Considering all samples, the coefficient of determination is R 2 = 0.75. This result is largely in line with the literature values [94,95]. Differentiating the extraction points shows that the correlation is significantly higher for the effluent samples (R 2 = 0.95) than for the influent samples (R 2 = 0.19).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Considering all samples, the coefficient of determination is R 2 = 0.75. This result is largely in line with the literature values [94,95]. Differentiating the extraction points shows that the correlation is significantly higher for the effluent samples (R 2 = 0.95) than for the Considering all samples, the coefficient of determination is R 2 = 0.75.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation