Assessing a priori acceptance of shared dockless e-scooters in Iran

Sociopsychological factors associated with the adoption and usage of electric micromobility. A literature review

“…This is directly related to the recent surge of e-MM around the world and the growing interest in their impacts on society. In fact, 24 articles were published in 2021 (Teixeira et al, 2021;Glavić et al, 2021;Edel et al, 2021;Esztergár-Kiss and Lopez Lizarraga, 2021;Flores and Jansson, 1957;Huang, 2021;Kazemzadeh and Koglin, 2021;Kopplin et al, 2021;Kwiatkowski et al, 2021;Lee et al, 2021a;Melia and Bartle, 2021;Mitra and Hess, 2021;Patil and Majumdar, 2021;Rejali et al, 2021;Thomas, 2021;Abouelela et al, 2021;Bateman et al, 2021;Biegańska et al, 2021;Bielinski et al, 2021;Buehler et al, 2021;De Ceunynck et al, 2021;Eccarius et al, 2021), showing the attention academia is paying to these new modes.…”

“…("electric bike") OR ("e-bike") OR ("ebike") OR ("electric bicycle") OR ("e-cycling") OR ("pedelec") OR ("pedelec bike") OR ("pedelec mobility")) OR (("electric scooter") OR ("e-scooter")) OR (("electric micromobility") OR ("e-micromobility") OR ("electric two-wheelers") AND ("psychological factors") OR ("motivations") OR ("perceived benefits") OR ("perceived barriers") OR ("social factors") Dowling et al, 2015;Fitt and Curl, 2020;Fitt and Curl, 2019;Buehler et al, 2021;Edel et al, 2021;Huang, 2021;Kopplin et al, 2021;Mitra and Hess, 2021;Rejali et al, 2021;bureau de recherche 6t, 2019;Hardt et al, 2019), 4 used both e-bikes and e-scooters (Flores and Jansson, 1957;Pimentel and Lowry, 2020;Rayaprolu and Venigalla, 2020;Bieliński and Ważna, 2020a), and the rest were not specifically using one of these vehicles, but e-micromobility, PETs and light electric two-wheelers (De Ceunynck et al, 2021;Esztergár-Kiss and Lopez Lizarraga, 2021;Patil and Majumdar, 2021;Hyvönen et al, 2016). Finally, regarding the methodology, a total of 51 studies collected data using surveys (Nematchoua et al, 2020), (Teixeira et al, 2021), (Bielinski et al, 2021;Buehler et al, 2021;De Ceunynck et al, 2021;Eccarius et al, 2021;Edel et al, 2021;Esztergár-Kiss and Lopez Lizarraga, 2021;Flores and Jansson, 1957;Huang, 2021), (Kopplin et al, 2021), (Kwiatkowski et al, 2021), (Johnson and Rose, 2013), (Mitra and Hess, 2021;…”

“…Finally, regarding the methodology, a total of 51 studies collected data using surveys (Nematchoua et al, 2020), (Teixeira et al, 2021), (Bielinski et al, 2021;Buehler et al, 2021;De Ceunynck et al, 2021;Eccarius et al, 2021;Edel et al, 2021;Esztergár-Kiss and Lopez Lizarraga, 2021;Flores and Jansson, 1957;Huang, 2021), (Kopplin et al, 2021), (Kwiatkowski et al, 2021), (Johnson and Rose, 2013), (Mitra and Hess, 2021;Patil and Majumdar, 2021;Rejali et al, 2021), , (bureau de recherche 6t, 2019), (Arsenio et al, 2018), (Hardt et al, 2019;Haustein and Møller, 2016a;Hiselius and Svenssona, 2014;Hyvönen et al, 2016), (Van Cauwenberg et al, 2019), (Kaplan et al, 2015), (Krauss et al, 2022), (Sellaouti et al, 2020), (Simsekoglu and Klöckner, 2019b), (Gorenflo et al, 2017a), (Ling et al, 2017), (Macarthur, 2017), (Pimentel and Lowry, 2020), (Rayaprolu and Venigalla, 2020), (Sanders et al, 2020), (Glavić et al, 2021), (Alamelu et al, 2015;An et al, 2013;Eccarius and Lu, 2018;Elias and Gitelman, 2018;Lee et al, 2021b;…”

“…Moreover, in 11 studies the sample comprised only users from university campuses, i.e., students and staff (Nematchoua et al, 2020;Edge et al, 2018;Dowling et al, 2015;Buehler et al, 2021;Eccarius et al, 2021;Arsenio et al, 2018;Plazier et al, 2017;Gorenflo et al, 2017a;Macarthur, 2017;Sanders et al, 2020;Eccarius and Lu, 2018). (Johnson and Rose, 2013;Van Cauwenberg et al, 2019;Mayer, 2020;Rayaprolu and Venigalla, 2020;Alamelu et al, 2015;An et al, 2013;Eccarius and Lu, 2018;Ye et al, 2014;Zuev, 2018;Haustein and Møller, 2016b;Glavić et al, 2021;Kaplan et al, 2018;Bielinski et al, 2021;Edel et al, 2021;Kopplin et al, 2021;Mitra and Hess, 2021;Rejali et al, 2021;Macarthur, 2017) (Fyhri et al, 2017;Abouelela et al, 2021;Hyvönen et al, 2016;Kaplan et al, 2015;Krauss et al, 2022;Gorenflo et al, 2017a;Lin et al, 2018;Bateman et al, 2021;Buehler et al, Ease of use/ Comfort (Teixeira et al, 2021;Fyhri et al, 2017;…”

“…In this line, convenience can be conceptualized as the perception of time and effort that users invest into using a service (Buehler et al, 2021). This means that the less time and effort users have to invest in the service, the higher the level of convenience perceived by individuals (Bateman et al, 2021;De Ceunynck et al, 2021;Ye et al, 2014;Zuev, 2018;Eccarius et al, 2021;Rejali et al, 2021;Andersson AAdell et al, 2021;Hardt et al, 2019;Plazier et al, 2017;Leger et al, 2019;Sanders et al, 2020;An et al, 2013). In this context, convenience includes aspects such as distance to the service (coverage), availability of vehicles (fleet size), accident/damage handling, avoiding traffic congestions, or lack of problems with parking spaces.…”