1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90195-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing activity in joint replacement patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
483
4
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 778 publications
(506 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
11
483
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Substantial inter-and intraobserver agreement has been reported for the anterior impingement test [24], ROM [15,25,50], and the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score [19]. At followup, additional hip scores were assessed including the WOMAC [4], the Harris hip score (HHS) [14], the SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Scales [12,48], and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score [51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial inter-and intraobserver agreement has been reported for the anterior impingement test [24], ROM [15,25,50], and the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score [19]. At followup, additional hip scores were assessed including the WOMAC [4], the Harris hip score (HHS) [14], the SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Scales [12,48], and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score [51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical evaluations included a physical examination, Harris hip score [17], WOMAC score [2], and administration of a questionnaire (Appendix 1) on functional topics related to THA such as job choice, pregnancy, and childbirth. Patient activity levels were rated using a modified version of the UCLA Activity Level Scale [40] and Devane activity level scale [6]. A questionnaire that included items regarding any noise during daily activity (the presence of noise; the nature, time of onset, and frequency of the noise and activities associated with the noise; awareness of the noise by other people; intensity of the noise with time; associated pain; and effect of the noise on the quality of life) was completed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical evaluation included preoperative Knee Society scores [14] and, at final followup, the need for reoperation, the Knee Society score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) [1], SF-36 general health questionnaire, and activity level via the UCLA [26] and Tegner [25] scales. All patients were encouraged to return for routine clinical and radiographic followup.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%