2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing adherence with toothbrushing instructions using a data logger toothbrush

Abstract: Objectives To evaluate patient compliance with toothbrushing instructions using a data logger and a brushing diary. Methods Dental patients were provided with powered toothbrushes modified to carry electronic data loggers. Demonstration of the most effective way to use the toothbrush was provided with instructions to brush for 2 minutes morning and evening. Data logger brushes were supplied for two episodes of 8 weeks. Brushing time was also recorded in a diary during episode 1. Results Data from 14 brushes (2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[15,31] There have been few reports using direct observation methodology to assess and quantify the effectiveness of TB; instead, indirect methods, such as the presence of plaque, calculus, or debris, have been used to measure TB effectiveness—and such indirect approaches have strengths and limitations. [32,33] On the other hand, “biofeedback” devices, a direct method of evaluation, are now available; however, they are bulky, not cost-effective, can be technique sensitive, and often require an “in-office” procedure that can limit access to this technology. [31] As well, sensor-based toothbrushes, another direct method of evaluation, are available and increasingly provide intricate details of TB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15,31] There have been few reports using direct observation methodology to assess and quantify the effectiveness of TB; instead, indirect methods, such as the presence of plaque, calculus, or debris, have been used to measure TB effectiveness—and such indirect approaches have strengths and limitations. [32,33] On the other hand, “biofeedback” devices, a direct method of evaluation, are now available; however, they are bulky, not cost-effective, can be technique sensitive, and often require an “in-office” procedure that can limit access to this technology. [31] As well, sensor-based toothbrushes, another direct method of evaluation, are available and increasingly provide intricate details of TB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Помимо поведенческих факторов, на эффективность индивидуальных мер профилактики влияет качество средств гигиены, в том числе зубных щеток [26,52,55,60,88], дизайн которых в последние годы претерпевает по-стоянные изменения в соответствии с технологическим прогрессом.…”
Section: стоматология 2 2015unclassified
“…The current advice is to brush twice a day for 2 min with a fluoridated dentifrice ( 15 ). However, poor adherence is a problem, with some studies suggesting that while 75% of UK adults report brushing twice a day ( 16 ), this may be an overestimate, with brushing times also being shorter than recommended ( 17 ). In a study of 14 volunteers, only 34% of brushing events recorded in 2 months complied with guidelines (120 s of brushing time), and this decreased to 24% over the next 6 months ( 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, poor adherence is a problem, with some studies suggesting that while 75% of UK adults report brushing twice a day ( 16 ), this may be an overestimate, with brushing times also being shorter than recommended ( 17 ). In a study of 14 volunteers, only 34% of brushing events recorded in 2 months complied with guidelines (120 s of brushing time), and this decreased to 24% over the next 6 months ( 17 ). With the aim of combatting this problem and to further aid in the removal of oral biofilms, antimicrobial agents are commonly added to fluoridated dentifrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%