2017
DOI: 10.3390/f8100370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Alternative Silvicultural Prescriptions for Mid-Rotation, Unthinned, Spruce-Fir Stands in Maine

Abstract: Abstract:Determining the optimal timing and type of entry in mid-rotation, unthinned stands can be complicated by a variety of economic and biological factors. In this analysis, long-term data from the Commercial Thinning Research Network was used to project spruce-fir (Picea spp.-Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) stand growth on six different sites across Maine following six alternative thinning treatments (33% and 50% relative density removal paired with low, crown, and dominant thinning methods). Results showed th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), which are established and grow best naturally under partial shade [2]. Thinning operations are also key to manage overstocked stands and to restore ecosystem services [3][4][5]. A major component of these partial timber harvests are the trees left behind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), which are established and grow best naturally under partial shade [2]. Thinning operations are also key to manage overstocked stands and to restore ecosystem services [3][4][5]. A major component of these partial timber harvests are the trees left behind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such harvesting methods are widely believed to ensure slash on the trail (armor for roots and soil), exhibit increased productivity compared to that of conventional CTL, and have less adverse impact on the regeneration. However, the total cost of harvest is generally higher for Hyb CTL compared to a conventional CTL due to the additional equipment (feller-buncher) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, if forest residues produced by forest management were not being utilized for energy production, they would be burned on-site for disposal, which is a common practice with significant emissions and fire risk considerations [3]. Various aspects of recovering forest residues consisting of tree-tops, off-shoots, branches, foliage, non-merchantable and small-diameter trees left after timber harvest (referred to as "biomass" in this paper) have been widely researched, including harvesting operations, logistics, biomass recovery, moisture content, and economic and environmental benefits [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, the major focus remains on the financial viability of biomass recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%