2011
DOI: 10.3375/043.031.0204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing an Imperiled Oak Savanna Landscape in Northwestern Ohio using Landsat Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification accuracy values for both 2000 ((71%) and 2014 (74%) were lower than the 85% overall accuracy threshold used by the United States Geological Survey to determine acceptability (Chai et al, 2009). Nonetheless, the accuracy values of both 2000 and 2014 were similar to that reported in other savannas (Ruelland et al, 2010;Schetter and Root, 2011). The lower accuracy of mapping could be as a result of the heterogeneity of forest patches which according to Ruelland et al (2010) is difficult to detect in the savanna matrix by using medium resolution satellite image such as Landsat.…”
Section: Landcover Map Accuraciesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The classification accuracy values for both 2000 ((71%) and 2014 (74%) were lower than the 85% overall accuracy threshold used by the United States Geological Survey to determine acceptability (Chai et al, 2009). Nonetheless, the accuracy values of both 2000 and 2014 were similar to that reported in other savannas (Ruelland et al, 2010;Schetter and Root, 2011). The lower accuracy of mapping could be as a result of the heterogeneity of forest patches which according to Ruelland et al (2010) is difficult to detect in the savanna matrix by using medium resolution satellite image such as Landsat.…”
Section: Landcover Map Accuraciesmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…(sundews) and Opuntia spp. (prickly pear cacti) within a few km of one another; however, less than 1% of the original habitat remains (Brewer and Vankat 2004;Schetter and Root 2011). Much of the remaining area is now preserved and managed by the Metroparks of the Toledo Area, The Nature Conservancy, and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources.…”
Section: Study Areasmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The original landcover map for the Oak Openings Region was developed by Schetter and Root (2011) using 30 m pixel Landsat data and contains a total of 15 different land classes, including asphalt, turf, residential, swamp, floodplain and upland forest, savanna, wet prairie, prairie, barren, meadow, shrub/scrub, conifer, crop and pond. We excluded wet prairie, barren, shrub/scrub and conifer cover in further analysis due to their low sample size and relatively low frequency within the Oak Openings Region.…”
Section: Macrohabitat Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%