Assessing and decomposing inequality of opportunity in access to child health and nutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from three countries with low human development index

Abstract

Background Inequality of opportunity in health and nutrition is a major public health issue in the developing regions. This study analyzed the patterns and extent of inequality of opportunity in health and nutrition among children under-five across three countries sub-Saharan Africa with low Human development index (HDI). Methods We used data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey of the Democratic Republic of Congo (20,792 households, 21,756 women aged 15 to 49 and 21,456 children under five), Guinea Bissau (6601 households, 10,234 women aged 15–49 and 7573 children under five) and Mali (11,830 households, 18,409 women in 15–49 years and 16,468 children under five) to compute the human opportunity index (HOI) and the dissimilarity index (D-index). Secondly, the Shapley decomposition method was used to estimate the relative contribution of circumstances that are beyond the control of children under-five and affecting their development outcomes in later life stages. Results The study revealed that children belonging to the most favorable group had higher access rates for immunization (93.64%) and water and sanitation facilities (73.59%) in Guinea Bissau. In Congo DR, the access rate was high for immunization (93.9%) for children in the most favorable group. In Mali, access rates stood at 6.56% for children in the most favorable group. In Guinea Bissau, the inequality of opportunity was important in access to health services before and after delivery (43.85%). In Congo DR, the inequality of opportunity was only high for the immunization composite indicator (83.79%) while in Mali, inequality of opportunity was higher for access to health services before and after delivery (41.67%). Conclusion The results show that there are efforts in some places to promote access to health and nutrition services in order to make access equal without distinction linked to the socio-economic and demographic characteristics in which the children live. However, the inequalities of opportunity observed between the children of the most favorable group and those of the least favorable group, remain in general at significant levels and call on government of these countries to implement policies taking them into account.

Undernutrition in children aged 0–59 months by region and over time: secondary analysis of the Burkina Faso 2012–2018 National Nutrition Surveys

“…This means that access to healthcare could be associated with nutritional status. The persistent prevalence of undernutrition translates a need, not just for the community management of wasting programmes which have been shown to be effective, but for effective prevention programmes as well as structural changes allowing reduction of inequalities 33–36…”

The Health Equity Explorer: An open-source resource for distributed health equity visualization and research across common data models

“…During preparation and updates of D4E data, patient addresses are geocoded to the census and zip code level. Data for census-and zip-code-level "place-based" social and environmental drivers of health (e.g., Child Opportunity Index (COI), Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), and American Community Survey (ACS)) for all census tracts in the USA [22][23][24][25][26]. Data in D4E are a limited dataset (PHI limited to dates, zip codes, and census tracts).…”

The determinants of inequality in child nutrition status: Evidence from Jordan

“…There is a large body of literature that estimates inequality of opportunity in early childhood development, as a key and concerning cornerstone of subsequent inequality (Aizawa, 2019;Assaad et al, 2012;de Barros et al, 2009;Krishnan et al, 2016;Sanoussi et al, 2020). The empirical literature estimating inequality of opportunity in child development globally tends to focus on easily measured circumstances, including socioeconomic factors such as parents' education and wealth, geographic location, access to clean water and sanitation, and gender.…”