Assessing and Improving the Use of Online Information About Child Development, Education, Health, and Well-Being in Low-Education, Low-Income Parents: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Multiphase Study

Abstract

BackgroundThis study is born from a partnership between Web editors of Naître et grandir (N&G) and AboutKidsHealth (AKH) and researchers who developed and validated the Information Assessment Method (IAM). N&G and AKH are popular Canadian websites with high-quality comprehensive information about child development, education, health, and well-being. IAM allows parents to assess online information and provide feedback to Web editors. High-quality online consumer health information improves knowledge, self-efficacy, and health. However, low-socioeconomic status (SES) parents underuse N&G and IAM, despite these parents being more likely to report decreased worries and increased confidence as outcomes from N&G information.ObjectiveThe study is aimed to improve low-SES parents’ use of online child information and interaction with Web editors and explore subsequent health outcomes for parents and children.MethodsMultiphase mixed-methods design. Our general approach is centered on organizational participatory research. In phase 1, we will conduct a qualitative interpretive study to identify barriers and facilitators to using N&G information and to interacting with N&G editors via IAM; interview more than 10 low-SES parents about their experience with N&G and IAM and more than 10 nonusers of N&G and IAM; and use thematic analysis to identify main barriers and facilitators. In phase 2, we will integrate parents’ views (phase 1 findings) in N&G and IAM and implement a new version: IAM+N&G+. In phase 3, we will conduct a quantitative prospective longitudinal study (pre-/postimplementation monitoring of knowledge use and outcomes). We will compare the use of original (IAM and N&G) and new (IAM+ and N&G+) versions using Google Analytics variables, IAM variables, a material and social deprivation index, and demographics. We anticipate increased use post implementation (linear mixed modeling). In phase 4, we will conduct a qualitative descriptive study on outcomes of information use. We will interview more than 30 low-SES parents who receive and rate the N&G+ newsletter using IAM+ and analyze data in the form of life histories to describe how parents and children experience perceived outcomes.ResultsThe project was funded in 2017 by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and received an ethics approval by the McGill University’s institutional review board. Data collection for phase 1 was completed in 2018. Phases 2 to 4 will be conducted until 2020. Findings from this study will also be used to develop a free toolkit, useful to all Web editors, with recommendations for improving health information for low-SES persons and interactions with them using IAM.ConclusionsThe results of this study will provide a deep understanding of how low-SES parents use online child information and interact with Web editors. Following the implementation of IAM+N&G+, results will also elucidate subsequent health outcomes for low-SES parents and children after interaction with Web editors has been optimized.International Registered Report Identifi...

Parental knowledge of children’s developmental milestones in Aseer, Saudi Arabia

“…Many recent studies sought to evaluate the effect of well-designed websites on knowledge about childhood development. [ 24 ] We could see a trend of such online educational interventions in the coming years, and we should follow suit in our Arabic-speaking area of the world. Over 61% of our recruited parents avoided using formal workshops and, in a concerning finding, 42.4% avoided doctors as source of information.…”

Understanding parents' use of a knowledge translation tool to manage children's vaccination pain

“… 14 , 31 It evaluates these concepts through 4 domains: plans to use the information, perceived relevance of parenting resources, cognitive effects of the information, and anticipated benefits of resource use. 32 This questionnaire, which has been shown to have very good ecological, content, and construct validity, as validated with parents of young children, 7 adapts the IAM framework and tailors the questions specifically to parent-directed resources. The IAM outcomes measured through the IAM-Parents are the situational relevance of the information, cognitive impact of information (ie, whether the information aligns with an individual's attitudes, provides new information, or provides reassurance), intention to use information, and anticipated benefits (eg, patient satisfaction and reduction of anxiety).…”

Maternal Experience with Online Information on Parenting and Infant Care: Qualitative Findings from Quebec, Canada

“…Recent studies, how-ever, are pointing more to a knowledge gap, suggesting that, while Internet access is, in fact, improving among those who are socially and economically disadvantaged, their use of the information they find may be deficient, which could exacerbate inequalities (Bonfadelli, 2002, Rothbaum et al, 2008, van Deursen et al, 2015. Thus, to avoid approaching the issue simplistically, it would be important to conduct a thorough and nuanced examination of the perspectives of those directly concerned, to mitigate the risk of reinforcing prejudices towards people who are already widely stigmatized (Monnickendam et al, 2007, Pluye et al, 2018.…”