2008
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-4605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Asset Indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Socioeconomic status was determined by a list of household assets and amenities. [16] Sexual behaviour measures (age at first foreplay, oral, anal and/or vaginal intercourse, age and gender of partner, coerced or voluntary) were collected from age 11 years at six subsequent time points (11 -12 years, 13 years, 14 years, 15 years, 16 years and 17 -18 years). Self-reported responses were submitted through the method of secret ballot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socioeconomic status was determined by a list of household assets and amenities. [16] Sexual behaviour measures (age at first foreplay, oral, anal and/or vaginal intercourse, age and gender of partner, coerced or voluntary) were collected from age 11 years at six subsequent time points (11 -12 years, 13 years, 14 years, 15 years, 16 years and 17 -18 years). Self-reported responses were submitted through the method of secret ballot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 We are grateful to an anonymous referee for this observation. 13 Ferreira and Gignoux [11] offer a formal proof of this intuitive lower-bound result. provides detailed information on economic outcomes, but not on some of the most important candidate circumstance variables, such as the education of the parents of present-day workers.…”
Section: The Data and Two Alternative Indicators Of Economic Advantagementioning
confidence: 86%
“…θ r is therefore a lower-bound estimate of the actual share of ex-ante inequality of opportunity in total inequality. 13 In the remainder of this paper, we apply this measure of ex-ante inequality of opportunity to a situation where information on the advantage variable y and the circumstance vector C are not directly available in the same household survey, so that either y must be constructed as a composite aggregate of various underlying indicators (our "wealth index" method), or information on y from an ancillary survey must be used to impute it into the main survey containing information on C (our "imputed consumption" method). We compare the two methods in seeking to quantify inequality of opportunity in Turkey.…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Key contributions to the topic are Pritchett (1999, 2001), Rutstein and Johnson (2004), and Filmer and Scott (2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%