2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing canopy PRI for water stress detection with diurnal airborne imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
156
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
18
156
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, factors like leaf age can also influence the spectral response thus impacting these VIs responses [70]. Contrarily, PRI is a stress/physiology-oriented hyperspectral VI [49] designed for measuring subtle decreases of reflectance around 531 nm due to changes in the xanthophyll cycle pigment activity resulting from stress conditions, including water stress conditions [32,34,68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, factors like leaf age can also influence the spectral response thus impacting these VIs responses [70]. Contrarily, PRI is a stress/physiology-oriented hyperspectral VI [49] designed for measuring subtle decreases of reflectance around 531 nm due to changes in the xanthophyll cycle pigment activity resulting from stress conditions, including water stress conditions [32,34,68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodríguez-Pérez et al [4] obtained good results in the estimation of water potential at canopy level using a RGRI adjusted for specific wavelengths. Differently, other authors preferred the PRI computed with the standard formulation as a good indicator of crop water stress [34,35,72]. However, issues related with viewing and illumination geometry effects, changes due to wilting or in leaf pigments content, as well as canopy structure, can affect the performance of PRI as a water stress indicator [22,34,73].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PRI is chosen as it is based on subtle absorption features of bio-chemicals (xanthophyll, carotenoids and chlorophylls), and is related to photosynthetic efficiency, light use efficiency as well as water stress [32,33]. The PRI is frequently used on leaf, canopy and ecosystem level, but the meaningfulness when applied at satellite scale is critically discussed [32], and high-spectral resolution instruments such as EnMAP have the potential to overcome some of the problems.…”
Section: Further Influence On Thematic Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably connected with the fact that, apart from the contents of carotenoid pigments and light use efficiency, it is also influenced by several other factors, such as reflection from the soil background (as stated above -a highly significant factor in the case of the crops analysed in this study); proportions between direct and diffuse incoming radiation; structure of the canopy; the angle of solar rays; and sun-vegetation cover-sensor geometry (relative to the Sun as well as elements of the vegetation cover) (Grace et al, 2007;Hall et al, 2008;Louis et al, 2005;Suarez et al, 2008). Due to the measurement errors caused by these factors, although PRI works very well as an indicator of LUE at the leaf level (Filela et al, 1996;Gamon and Surfus, 1999;Penuelas et al, 1995Penuelas et al, , 1997, the accuracy of models based on this index is more limited if they are applied at the canopy level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%