2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2108.08975
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Cerebellar Disorders With Wearable Inertial Sensor Data Using Time-Frequency and Autoregressive Hidden Markov Model Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The severity estimation task was modeled as described in Methods (II-D). For this task, the combination of ResNet18 total , the agreement between predicted and clinical scores was MAE = 3.5 and R 2 = 0.61, which is comparable with other approaches using wearable inertial measurement unit data [6].…”
Section: B Severity Estimationsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The severity estimation task was modeled as described in Methods (II-D). For this task, the combination of ResNet18 total , the agreement between predicted and clinical scores was MAE = 3.5 and R 2 = 0.61, which is comparable with other approaches using wearable inertial measurement unit data [6].…”
Section: B Severity Estimationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A variety of other techniques and technologies have been used and proposed in the past, including inertial measurement units (IMUs) that record accelerometer and gyroscope data to quantify gait or limb movement [6], [7], computer mouse tasks that assess arm motor control [12], and eye tracking devices to quantify eye movement abnormalities [13]. Our approach complements prior work, by using convolutional neural networks with mel spectrogram time and frequency gradient inputs to probe the effects of ataxia on vocal motor impairments in an unbiased fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation