“…For example, for Chameliya, Karnali, Bheri, Kaligandaki, Indrawati, Tamakoshi, Arun and Tamor basins of Nepal, NSE (and PBIAS) values are respectively 0.75 (+5.1%), 0.84 (−14.2%), 0.70 (−4.4%), 0.78 (−4.0%), 0.72 (-), 0.76 (−1.7%), 0.81 (−6.8%) and 0.85 (+4.3%) for calibration period while these values are 0.65 (-9.3%), 0.84 (−15.4%), 0.71 (−8.9%), 0.8 (+9.6%), 0.87 (-), 0.84 (+5.2%), 0.58 (+24.6%) and 0.89 (+5.5%) respectively for validation period [25,40,45,47,51,[85][86][87]. Similarly, NSE (and PBIAS) values of Gilgelabay basin of Ethiopia, Gurupura basin of India and Tizinafu basin of Western China were found to be respectively 0.69 (+4.8%), 0.83 (+17.5%) and 0.71 (+5.79%) for calibration period while these values for validation period were 0.68 (+4.9%), 0.85 (−3.9%) and 0.64 (−18.0%), respectively [88][89][90]. Moreover, [42] used SWAT model to simulate five glacierized mountain river basins of the world that includes the Narayani (Nepal), Vakhsh (Central Asia), Rhone (Switzerland), Mendoza (Central Andes, Argentina), and Chile (Central Dry Andes, Chile).…”