2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-018-0979-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing climate change impacts on river hydrology – A case study in the Western Ghats of India

Abstract: The objective of this study is to evaluate the hydrological impacts of climate change on rainfall, temperature and streamflow in a west flowing river originating in the Western Ghats of India. The longterm trend analysis for 110 yr of meteorological variables (rainfall and temperature) was carried out using the modified Mann-Kendall trend test and the magnitude of the trend was quantified using the Sen's slope estimator. The Regional Climate Model (RCM), COordinated Regional climate Downscaling EXperiment (COR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for Chameliya, Karnali, Bheri, Kaligandaki, Indrawati, Tamakoshi, Arun and Tamor basins of Nepal, NSE (and PBIAS) values are respectively 0.75 (+5.1%), 0.84 (−14.2%), 0.70 (−4.4%), 0.78 (−4.0%), 0.72 (-), 0.76 (−1.7%), 0.81 (−6.8%) and 0.85 (+4.3%) for calibration period while these values are 0.65 (-9.3%), 0.84 (−15.4%), 0.71 (−8.9%), 0.8 (+9.6%), 0.87 (-), 0.84 (+5.2%), 0.58 (+24.6%) and 0.89 (+5.5%) respectively for validation period [25,40,45,47,51,[85][86][87]. Similarly, NSE (and PBIAS) values of Gilgelabay basin of Ethiopia, Gurupura basin of India and Tizinafu basin of Western China were found to be respectively 0.69 (+4.8%), 0.83 (+17.5%) and 0.71 (+5.79%) for calibration period while these values for validation period were 0.68 (+4.9%), 0.85 (−3.9%) and 0.64 (−18.0%), respectively [88][89][90]. Moreover, [42] used SWAT model to simulate five glacierized mountain river basins of the world that includes the Narayani (Nepal), Vakhsh (Central Asia), Rhone (Switzerland), Mendoza (Central Andes, Argentina), and Chile (Central Dry Andes, Chile).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, for Chameliya, Karnali, Bheri, Kaligandaki, Indrawati, Tamakoshi, Arun and Tamor basins of Nepal, NSE (and PBIAS) values are respectively 0.75 (+5.1%), 0.84 (−14.2%), 0.70 (−4.4%), 0.78 (−4.0%), 0.72 (-), 0.76 (−1.7%), 0.81 (−6.8%) and 0.85 (+4.3%) for calibration period while these values are 0.65 (-9.3%), 0.84 (−15.4%), 0.71 (−8.9%), 0.8 (+9.6%), 0.87 (-), 0.84 (+5.2%), 0.58 (+24.6%) and 0.89 (+5.5%) respectively for validation period [25,40,45,47,51,[85][86][87]. Similarly, NSE (and PBIAS) values of Gilgelabay basin of Ethiopia, Gurupura basin of India and Tizinafu basin of Western China were found to be respectively 0.69 (+4.8%), 0.83 (+17.5%) and 0.71 (+5.79%) for calibration period while these values for validation period were 0.68 (+4.9%), 0.85 (−3.9%) and 0.64 (−18.0%), respectively [88][89][90]. Moreover, [42] used SWAT model to simulate five glacierized mountain river basins of the world that includes the Narayani (Nepal), Vakhsh (Central Asia), Rhone (Switzerland), Mendoza (Central Andes, Argentina), and Chile (Central Dry Andes, Chile).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, GCMs limit the accurate simulations of regional climatology due to the inability in accurately simulating features of local climate including topography, cloudiness, orography, and land use due to the inherent coarse resolution ranging between 100 and 250 km [40][41][42]. Hence, increased tendency is witnessed in applications of regional climate models (RCMs) combined with hydrological models to examine the impact of climate change on hydrology [43]. e resolution of these RCMs is in the range of 12 to 50 km, in proximity of the watershed scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gurupura river is one of the west-flowing rivers originating in the WG of India, at an elevation of 1880 m above mean sea level. The catchment has two river gauging stations at Addoor and Polali, which are maintained by the Central Water Commission, Government of India and the Public Works Department of the Government of Karnataka [34], respectively. For the present investigation, the Addoor gauging station was selected, which drains out an area of about 840 km 2 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep convection of this cloud system is due to latent heat release. The infrared satellite sensors may not detect precipitation from warm clouds and may lose the capture of ice loft, thereby detecting only a portion of rain from deep convection [6,11,34,60]. This process may be the reason for the lower performance of the satellite data-driven model than the IMD data-driven model.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Streamflow Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%