2021
DOI: 10.1002/pnp.719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing cognitive screeners with the critical success index

Abstract: Cognitive screening instruments are frequently used in the assessment of patients presenting with symptoms of dementia or cognitive impairment. Various test accuracy metrics have been defined for such instruments. This article describes a study in which metrics originally developed in weather forecasting, namely the critical success index and the equitable threat score, were applied to cognitive screening test accuracy studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Addressing the class imbalance problem using methods which oversample the minority class (in the current example TP cases), such as variants of the synthetic majority oversampling technique, SMOTE [21], or which undersample the majority class (in the current example TN) might be applicable. Comparisons of EI with measures such as the F measure [2,20] or the critical success index [2,24] which eschew TN values might be particularly pertinent in this class imbalance situation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing the class imbalance problem using methods which oversample the minority class (in the current example TP cases), such as variants of the synthetic majority oversampling technique, SMOTE [21], or which undersample the majority class (in the current example TN) might be applicable. Comparisons of EI with measures such as the F measure [2,20] or the critical success index [2,24] which eschew TN values might be particularly pertinent in this class imbalance situation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the CSI detection performance does not change as a function of event frequency [ 34 ], making it suitable for diverse count-rate scenarios. Although CSI is widely used to forecast weather events, it has been applied in other disciplines, when discrimination of rare events is required [ 35 ].…”
Section: Simplified Correlation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In signal detection theory, CSI is defined as the ratio of hits to the sum of hits, false alarms, and misses. 8,9 CSI may also be expressed in terms of Sens and PPV 7 : CSI values range from 0 to 1, interpreted as 0 = unable to forecast and 1 = perfect forecast. 5,10 CSI is not unbiased, because CSI = TP/(sample size N -TN), giving lower scores for rarer events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,10 CSI is not unbiased, because CSI = TP/(sample size N -TN), giving lower scores for rarer events. 9 In such circumstances, GS (also known as equitable threat score 5,11 ) may be preferred, as it takes into account the number of hits due to chance (CH), 8 where: or 9 :…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%