2010
DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2010.518814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing collaborative work in a higher education blended learning context: strategies and students’ perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Activities that promote a collaborative process of building and reshaping understanding with and among their peers might be especially important in courses that involve ethical reflection (Jonassen et al, 1996; McAlpine, 2000). In one study that evaluated both the content of the module and the tools used to deliver it, students’ feedback highlighted the importance of incorporating assignments that encouraged learning and critical reflection via peer assessment and interaction (Pombo et al, 2010). While none of the online Fogarty courses included peer reviews, peer critiques, and peer evaluations, they did rely heavily on activities that foster communications via the use of interactive discussion boards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Activities that promote a collaborative process of building and reshaping understanding with and among their peers might be especially important in courses that involve ethical reflection (Jonassen et al, 1996; McAlpine, 2000). In one study that evaluated both the content of the module and the tools used to deliver it, students’ feedback highlighted the importance of incorporating assignments that encouraged learning and critical reflection via peer assessment and interaction (Pombo et al, 2010). While none of the online Fogarty courses included peer reviews, peer critiques, and peer evaluations, they did rely heavily on activities that foster communications via the use of interactive discussion boards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, online training opportunities in research ethics have been developed for worldwide audiences that can supplement traditional learning by addressing limitations inherent in face-to-face educational programs (McAlpine, 2000; Pombo, Loureiro, & Moreira, 2010; University of Miami, 2012). Such offerings can reach a much larger number of individuals from diverse geographic locations, as they can be accessed “anytime, anywhere.” Issues with reliable Internet availability and limited bandwidth remain in LMICs, but have improved in recent years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the use of blended learning to enhance language learning in education has been well established over a significant period of time; however, its evolution has led to its adaptation to a variety of different areas in language learning. Blended learning has been explored in the area of reading skills development, such as improving vocabulary learning and reading skills (Alnoori & Obaid, 2017;Behjat, Yamini, & Bagheri, 2012;Ghazizadeh & Fatemipour, 2017;Hamdan, Mohamad, & Shaharuddin, 2017;Hinkelman, 2013;Kim, 2014) and reading strategies (Alshwiah, 2009;Hamdan et al, 2017;Levy, Dickerson, & Teague, 2011;Pombo, Loureiro, & Moreira, 2010).…”
Section: Blended Learning In Reading Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers in distance education underscore the importance of effective higher education teaching and the need for technology to be adapted to pedagogical consideration and not vice versa (cf. Holley & Oliver, 2010;Pombo et al, 2010;Stacey & Gerbic, 2007). Pedagogical requirements with regard to type of conceptual and clinical skills required in autism intervention involve high levels of engagement interaction, and feedback.…”
Section: Pedagogical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%