2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing compound binding to the Eg5 motor domain using a thermal shift assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the fragments, 73.2% (915 in total), displayed negative ΔT m values. This could be attributed to fragments stabilizing the unfolded state of the protein, or fragments aggregating and causing early destabilization and unfolding of the protein (37). Some fragments that possessed scaffolds identified as hits in this primary screen were members of this group displaying negative ΔT m values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the fragments, 73.2% (915 in total), displayed negative ΔT m values. This could be attributed to fragments stabilizing the unfolded state of the protein, or fragments aggregating and causing early destabilization and unfolding of the protein (37). Some fragments that possessed scaffolds identified as hits in this primary screen were members of this group displaying negative ΔT m values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 As shown in Table 1, these three series of dihydropyrazolo [3,4-b]pyridine compounds were mostly only moderately to weakly potent growth inhibition of HCT116 cell line, while compound 3c and 3d was found to have more potency against HCT116 cell line with the IC 50 values of 4.97 and 2.36 lM, respectively, compared with that of the positive control CPUYL064's 12.70 lM. Compounds with thienyl group at the R 1 group, such as 4b, 4c and 4d, showed moderate anti-proliferative cytotoxic activities with an IC 50 in the 11-25 lM range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…however, several communications describe combined analyses of potency versus thermal stability. 12,14,15 Very interestingly, in their study on the fatty acid amide hydrolase, slaymaker et al 15 were able to identify two different compound populations once they plotted a graph lnK i versus t m . unfortunately, no thermodynamic measurements were realized with these compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the binding of a ligand to a protein leads to the formation of a complex protein-ligand that usually exhibits a higher melting temperature, t m b , than the free protein. experiments have shown a good correlation between ligand potency measured in biochemical assays and shift in melting temperatures (Δt m = t m b -t m ) estimated in ftsa, [12][13][14][15] and ftsa is already routinely used to triage hits identified from high-throughput screening (hts) campaigns. moreover, Δt m s obtained from ftsa are directly connected to the thermodynamic parameters of the ligand-protein interaction, 7,16,17 providing a link to the thermodynamic signatures of the compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%