2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
100
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
100
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As the method cannot directly account for risks of incomplete information, subjectivity of assessment, and discordant opinions of experts, the author put forward a fuzzy extension of AHP [9].…”
Section: Assessment Of Operating Conditions Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the method cannot directly account for risks of incomplete information, subjectivity of assessment, and discordant opinions of experts, the author put forward a fuzzy extension of AHP [9].…”
Section: Assessment Of Operating Conditions Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the methodology of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) implemented by Buckley (1985) was employed. Fuzzy AHPs have been applied across a range of fields, including construction (Hsieh et al 2004;Jaskowski et al 2010), education (Goksu 2008;Celik, Kandakoglu, & Er 2009), human resources (Chou et al 2012), location selection (Bilisik et al 2014), marine engineering (Miri Lavasani et al 2011;Wang & Chin 2011;Celik & Kandakoglu 2012;Yanar & Tozan 2012), the automotive industry (Nepal et al 2010;Badizadeh & Khanmohammadi 2011;Bilgen & Sen 2012;Ghadimi et al 2012;Rathi et al 2015), supplier selection (Chan et al 2008;Kilincci & Onal 2011;Yucenur et al 2011;Shaw et al 2012;Rezaei et al 2014) and technology management (Erensal et al 2006). A comprehensive description of the methodology is expounded in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria for selection may vary between projects since the characteristics of them are distinct although there are some common characteristics of Contractor selection [10]. All the projects have a reasonable cost, require a reasonable quality, within a reasonable time and with reasonable security [11]. Due to this, the most common criteria considered during the selection Contractor are those related with the following aspects [12][13] [14]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of qualitative criteria it is necessary to describe the scoring method, which usually involves constructing discrete scales with verbal explanations [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%