2019
DOI: 10.7191/jeslib.2019.1132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Data Management Support Needs of Bioengineering and Biomedical Research Faculty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to what Wiley and Burnette (2019) discovered, these aspects of data management also presented problems to faculty in the current study. Faculty did not necessarily discuss these in the context of help-seeking, likely because one might not even know that problems of this nature exist until they arise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to what Wiley and Burnette (2019) discovered, these aspects of data management also presented problems to faculty in the current study. Faculty did not necessarily discuss these in the context of help-seeking, likely because one might not even know that problems of this nature exist until they arise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Over the past decade, academic libraries have worked to support the growing data management and scholarly communication needs of their campuses in the ever-changing digital world. Research has examined these needs from various perspectives and themes related to scholarly communications practices (Cooper et al 2017;Cooper et al 2019;Dawson 2014;Hendrix 2019), data management and data sharing (Akers & Doty 2013;Berman 2017;Buys & Shaw 2015;Federer et al 2015;Scaramozzino et al 2012;Tenopir et al 2011;Tenopir et al 2015;Wiley & Burnette 2019), and the needs and challenges of researchers (Mohr et al 2015;Monroe-Gulick et al 2017;Nickels & Davis 2020;Scaramozzino et al 2012;Westra 2010) have taken center stage. Most studies have also included questions that encouraged researchers to consider how they worked with their own libraries and whether the library could meet their information or support needs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OCLC's RDM service categories were identified by characterizing RDM service components in a review of more than a dozen research libraries in North America, Europe, and Australia, with the goal of "provid[ing] a useful heuristic for visualizing the scope of the RDM service space" [15]. The categories include (1) education services that aim to raise awareness of RDM's importance, instruct researchers in basic RDM skills, and introduce RDM tools and resources; (2) expertise services that offer decision support and customized solutions for RDM problems encountered by researchers; and (3) curation services that provide the technical infrastructure and related services that support RDM throughout the research process.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, the increasing volume of data-driven research and changing funding agency policies for research data management (RDM) have posed significant challenges for researchers who are not well versed in RDM practices and sharing [1,2]. In response, many libraries have expanded their services to address researchers' growing demand for RDM support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have introduced the current RDM practices and support needs of biomedical researchers (Federer, Lu, & Joubert, ; Wiley & Burnette, ). A common theme recurring in the literature is that researchers do not have a high level of data literacy skills, about how to organize, describe, process, store or preserve data, which confirms the urgent need for training researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%