2004
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Data Quality for Information Products: Impact of Selection, Projection, and Cartesian Product

Abstract: The cost associated with making decisions based on poor-quality data is quite high. Consequently, the management of data quality and the quality of associated data management processes has become critical for organizations. An important first step in managing data quality is the ability to measure the quality of information products (derived data) based on the quality of the source data and associated processes used to produce the information outputs. We present a methodology to determine two data quality char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
54
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(D. P. Ballou and Pazer 1985;D. Ballou et al 1998;Askira Gelman 2011;Parssian, Sarkar, and Jacob 2004), or use utility theory to characterize the impact of information quality (Even and Shankaranarayanan 2007;Ahituv 1980), which is difficult to apply in practice as utilities are difficult to link to key business performance indicators. In particular, the models do not consider the uncertainty that is inherent in the relationship between information quality and business outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(D. P. Ballou and Pazer 1985;D. Ballou et al 1998;Askira Gelman 2011;Parssian, Sarkar, and Jacob 2004), or use utility theory to characterize the impact of information quality (Even and Shankaranarayanan 2007;Ahituv 1980), which is difficult to apply in practice as utilities are difficult to link to key business performance indicators. In particular, the models do not consider the uncertainty that is inherent in the relationship between information quality and business outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of poor data quality (DQ) increases as larger and more complex information resources are being collected and maintained (Madnick and Zhu, 2006;Parssian and Jacob, 2004). Because most modern companies tend to collect increasing amounts of data, good data management is becoming ever more important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a response, in the last two decades, the issues of DQ have received a lot of attention, both by organisations worldwide and in academic literature. Several studies are exploring DQ challenges, focusing on DQ measurement and improvement (Batini and Scannapieco, 2006;Cappiello et al, 2006;Chen and Tseng, 2010;Chengalur-smith et al, 1999;Dejaeger et al, 2010;Delone and McLean, 1992;Eppler and Wittig, 2000;Fisher and Ballou, 2003;Jarke and Vassiliou, 1997;Kahun et al, 2002;Lee et al, 2002Lee et al, , 2006Madnick and Zhu, 2006;Maydanchik, 2007;Moraga et al, 2009;Paul et al, 1996;Panse and Ritter, 2009;Parssian and Jacob, 2004;Pipino et al, 2002;Raghunathan, 1999;Rahm and Do, 2000;Redman, 1998;Shankaranarayanan and Cai, 2006;Shankaranarayanan et al, 2003;Strong et al, 1997;Tayi and Ballou, 1998;Wand and Wang, 1996;Wang, 1998;Wang et al, 1995;Wang and Strong, 1996;Ware and Gandek, 1998;Watts et al, 2009). In practice, decision makers differentiate information from data intuitively, and describe information as data that has been processed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pazer (2003), Parssian, Sarkar, and Jacob (2004) and Shankaranarayanan, Ziad, and Wang (2003). More importantly, the simulation approach and mathematical models were based on the work of these academics and as such, this evaluation framework may be applied to any large-scale architecture at the design stage.…”
Section: Ballou Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking guidance from the works of information quality practitioners such as Ballou and Pazer (2003), Parssian, Sarkar, and Jacob (2004) and Shankaranarayanan, Ziad, and Wang (2003), an evaluation approach was conceived to demonstrate the predicted effect of change produced by the eHaaS design artifact. By so doing, evaluation comprising mathematical models examined the behaviors of three system actors and their effect on patient information flows within one of the most common scenarios within the Patient Journey e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%