1997
DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199706000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Depression among Persons with Chronic Pain Using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract: The results suggest that both questionnaires have good predictive validity among chronic pain patients, and decisions regarding the use of one questionnaire rather than the other may depend upon the goals of the user and the setting within which the questionnaire is used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
251
2
15

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
251
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of a cutoff of 16 on the CES-D may also be considered a limitation, as there is no consensus in the literature on the most valid cutoff for depression screening. A cutoff of 16 is most widely used, but has been criticized for being too low, leading to a high number of false positives and low PPV values [17,18,20,22]. Still, while workers in this study who scored above 16 may not have had clinical depression, we have shown that even subthreshold depressive symptoms are related to poorer RTW outcomes, a finding that is consistent with other research demonstrating a relationship between subthreshold depression and functional impairment [49][50][51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Use of a cutoff of 16 on the CES-D may also be considered a limitation, as there is no consensus in the literature on the most valid cutoff for depression screening. A cutoff of 16 is most widely used, but has been criticized for being too low, leading to a high number of false positives and low PPV values [17,18,20,22]. Still, while workers in this study who scored above 16 may not have had clinical depression, we have shown that even subthreshold depressive symptoms are related to poorer RTW outcomes, a finding that is consistent with other research demonstrating a relationship between subthreshold depression and functional impairment [49][50][51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This cutoff has been shown to be an indicator of significant depressive symptomatology [15]. The sensitivity and specificity of this cutoff for detecting depressive disorders has been demonstrated to range from 64 to 100 % and 39 to 94 %, respectively, in community, primary care, and pain populations [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of this cutoff have ranged from 14 to 63 % [16][17][18][19][20][21] and 78 to 99 % [17,[19][20][21], respectively.…”
Section: Main Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In considering the use of the BDI-II with this sample, where chronic pain is a common co-morbid condition (e.g., Blanchard et al, 1995), one choice is to remove somatic items when scoring the instrument. However, this procedure did not improve accuracy of an earlier version of the scale (e.g., Geisser, Roth, & Robinson, 1997). To facilitate comparison of the current data with previously published studies, the original scoring method was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CES-D has demonstrated strong associations with other depressive symptom measures (Radloff, 1977) and has been validated in pain populations (Geisser et al, 1997).…”
Section: Self-report Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%