2007
DOI: 10.1080/09500340601043447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing different forms of the strong-field approximation for harmonic generation in molecules

Abstract: We analyse three different formulations of the strong-field approximation for high-harmonic generation in diatomic molecules, based on length, velocity and acceleration form for the recombination amplitude. We compare the predictions for the two-centre interference with those from the time-dependent Schro¨dinger equation. We find that the velocity form gives the closest agreement with the exact results while being the simplest from a computational point of view.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the plane wave approximation for the continuum, however, these three forms are not equivalent any more. The acceleration form should be preferred [6] but Chirilȃ et al [7] showed that the velocity form yields very reliable results, while being easier and faster to evaluate than the acceleration form. We thus re-write Eq.…”
Section: Uvx 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the plane wave approximation for the continuum, however, these three forms are not equivalent any more. The acceleration form should be preferred [6] but Chirilȃ et al [7] showed that the velocity form yields very reliable results, while being easier and faster to evaluate than the acceleration form. We thus re-write Eq.…”
Section: Uvx 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recombination prefactor (6) can be written in different forms, which will lead to different results. The form of the dipole operator should not be confused with the gauge [29,31,37], which determines how the Hamiltonian is written. Explicitly, the length, velocity and acceleration forms of the dipole operator readd…”
Section: A Transition Amplitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SFA, however, has serious limitations. Apart from the gauge dependence and its influence on the structural interference [28,29,35], different forms of recombination dipole matrix element affect this condition [31,36,37]. The most appropriate form to be used has raised considerable debate in the context of the tomographical reconstruction of molecular orbitals [38][39][40] If the field however is orthogonally polarized, the electron's angle of return is effectively incorporated in the two-center interference condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we will consider the length and the velocity forms of the dipole operator. In the single-active-electron framework, the former and the latter lead to the worst and best description of the two-center interference patterns [10].…”
Section: B Many-body Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most well known of these is the lack of translational invariance when using the length form of the dipole operator. In the single-active electron approximation, it has been shown that the velocity form gives the most reliable results [10] and is easier to use than the acceleration form. In calculating the SFA prefactors the simplest approach is to use the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%