2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6627650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Dry Weight of Hemodialysis Patients via Sparse Laplacian Regularized RVFL Neural Network with L2,1-Norm

Abstract: Dry weight is the normal weight of hemodialysis patients after hemodialysis. If the amount of water in diabetes is too much (during hemodialysis), the patient will experience hypotension and shock symptoms. Therefore, the correct assessment of the patient’s dry weight is clinically important. These methods all rely on professional instruments and technicians, which are time-consuming and labor-intensive. To avoid this limitation, we hope to use machine learning methods on patients. This study collected demogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments for the rolling bearing fault diagnosis process demonstrate that the DM-RVFLNN model is superior and effective compared to standard RVFL. Considering the topological relationship of samples and to improve the robustness of the RVFL model, sparse Laplacian regularized RVFL neural network with L 2,1 -norm (SLapRVFL) [60] was proposed to assess the dry weight of hemodialysis patients and the experiments demonstrate that SLapRVFL is more robust than standard RVFL. Parija et al [61] proposed minimum variance-based kernel RVFL (MVKRVFL) to identify the seizure and non-seizure epileptic EEG signal.…”
Section: Rvfl With Manifold Learning Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments for the rolling bearing fault diagnosis process demonstrate that the DM-RVFLNN model is superior and effective compared to standard RVFL. Considering the topological relationship of samples and to improve the robustness of the RVFL model, sparse Laplacian regularized RVFL neural network with L 2,1 -norm (SLapRVFL) [60] was proposed to assess the dry weight of hemodialysis patients and the experiments demonstrate that SLapRVFL is more robust than standard RVFL. Parija et al [61] proposed minimum variance-based kernel RVFL (MVKRVFL) to identify the seizure and non-seizure epileptic EEG signal.…”
Section: Rvfl With Manifold Learning Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60,61 There has been significant progress in predicting complex volume-related events during dialysis using machine learning 56,64,65 (Table 3). Machine learning has been applied to the assessment of dry weight in dialysis patients using small dialysis datasets, [66][67][68][69][70] as well in the prediction of volume-related adverse events 56,64,65 (Table 3). Barbieri et al created a prototype algorithm for the prediction of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) using an artificial neural network consisting of 60 variables to create a multiple endpoint model predicting sessionspecific Kt/V, fluid volume removal, HR, and blood pressure (BP).…”
Section: Multiparameter Biosensors In Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gou et al targeted clinical dry weight prediction using data from 476 HD patients augmented with 10 cross‐fold validation 66 . A Sparse Laplacian regularized Random Vector Functional Link model consisting of seven input features (age, gender, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, BMI, heart rate, and years on dialysis) was found to have the best performance in predicting clinical dry weight ( R 2 = 0.9501, RMSE 1.3136 kg), in comparison to Multiple Kernel Support Vector Regression, Multikernel Ridge Regression, Linear Regression, an Artificial Neural Network, and bioimpedance using BCM 66 . This work was built upon in a subsequent study that examined the use of a multiple Laplacian‐regularized radial basis function neural network model in the same cohort of 476 patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Olivier Niel et al found that their ML model was able to predict C-DW with good agreement, with a mean difference of 0.09% of C-DW. Although, there was a wide limit of agreement at -4.27 to +4.44% of C-DW (absolute kilogram was not reported), and the number out of agreement was 20 out of 476 samples 41 . The input parameters in this study included demographic data, and time-variable data as a time stamp of pre-dialysis blood pressure and heart rate was used as an input.…”
Section: Machine Learning Model and Dry Weight Predictionmentioning
confidence: 92%