2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98953-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing e-Justice Smartness: A New Framework for e-Justice Evaluation Through Public Values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, our paper contributes to the literature on algorithm aversion and antecedents of procedural justice within the public sector (Burton, Stein, & Jensen, 2019;Logg, Minson, & Moore, 2019). We moreover contribute to research on public values as an important determinant of technology adoption, rather than just focusing on the technical aspects of technology (Lupo, 2019;Twizeyimana & Andersson, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More generally, our paper contributes to the literature on algorithm aversion and antecedents of procedural justice within the public sector (Burton, Stein, & Jensen, 2019;Logg, Minson, & Moore, 2019). We moreover contribute to research on public values as an important determinant of technology adoption, rather than just focusing on the technical aspects of technology (Lupo, 2019;Twizeyimana & Andersson, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…More attention has been generated for the connection between justice and new technologies, for instance, in the smart city literature on ejustice (Lupo, 2019). Smart cities studies on e-justice have however been criticized for mostly focusing on economic outcomes such as efficiency, while disregarding aspects relating to public value.…”
Section: Procedural Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive assessment of e-justice is being developed based on representing justice in the broad sense, e.g. not just as a set of services, but as a set of public values (Lupo, 2019). As a result of the analysis of foreign experience, we can conclude that most of the existing acts are aimed at creating the most favorable conditions for innovation and research (Lepore et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessity to develop "online courts", to introduce innovative digital technologies into EU courts long before the crises of 2020 was highlighted in the papers of Gutierrez Zarza A. [7], Lupo G. [8], Lodder A.R., Thomas F. Gordon, [9], Bex F., Prakken, H., van Engers T. et al [10]. From M.A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%