2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing e-learning 2.0 system success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
122
2
17

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
13
122
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…User satisfaction and intention to use affected each other. Some studies also confirmed that information quality, service quality, and system quality affected user satisfaction, and user satisfaction affected e-learning intention (Chang, 2013;DeLone & McLean, 2003;Roca et al, 2006;Wang & Chiu, 2011). …”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Hypotheses Revised Informmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…User satisfaction and intention to use affected each other. Some studies also confirmed that information quality, service quality, and system quality affected user satisfaction, and user satisfaction affected e-learning intention (Chang, 2013;DeLone & McLean, 2003;Roca et al, 2006;Wang & Chiu, 2011). …”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Hypotheses Revised Informmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Cho et al (2009), Elsayed (2005, and Liaw (2008) all stated that online interaction affected elearning performance. A study by Bharati and Chandhury (2004) showed that online interaction mechanisms positively affected online user satisfaction, while a study done by Wang and Chiu (2011) revealed that online communication quality positively affected user satisfaction and elearning continuance intention. Li et al (2012) confirmed that system interaction positively affected intention to reuse e-learning through usefulness and ease of use.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Hypotheses Revised Informmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DeLone and McLean (2003) proposed that, because of the system use and user satisfaction, a particular net benefit will occur from the viewpoint of the stakeholder system. Moreover, based on the IS/educational technology success literature (Chen, 2010;DeLone & McLean, 2003;Lin & Wang, 2012;H.-C. Wang & Chiu, 2011;Y.-S. Wang, 2008) and the theory of planned behaviour (Ajzen, 1991), satisfaction and intention to use are usually modelled as mediating factors in determining information system acceptance by users in IS fields (Ajzen, 1991;Brady & Robertson, 2001;Dabholkar, Shepherd, & Thorpe, 2000;Rai et al, 2002;Zviran & Erlich, 2003). Therefore, we anticipate the intention to use and user satisfaction mediate the effects of predictor variables on student performance as follows: H4: The intention to use and user satisfaction mediates the relationship between predictor variables and student academic performance in a statistics class.…”
Section: The Mediating Effects Of Intention To Use and User Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating the success of systems within businesses is certainly recognized as the single most critical issue of IS management discipline [7]. IS Scholars use various techniques to assess systems' success such as investigating success of a system via the system usage, user satisfaction and other categories of performance [5], [8], [9]. Interestingly, many prior literature note user satisfaction to be a surrogate measure for system success, and have use user satisfaction to assess the success implementation of a IS [10]- [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%