2018
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing ecological and molecular divergence between the closely related species Hydrolagus pallidus and H. affinis (Chimaeridae)

Abstract: This study investigated taxonomic validity of the pale ghost shark Hydrolagus pallidus Hardy & Stehmann, 1990, which was described as a species distinct from the smalleyed rabbitfish H. affinis (de Brito Capello 1868). While few morphological characters distinguish the two taxa, a striking difference in sex ratio and fixed differences (1·1-1·6% divergence) in the cytochrome oxidase subunit I barcoding gene support the recognition of both species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, color polymorphism has been observed within and among populations of reef fishes and has been linked to sex, life history stage, or behavior (Thresher, 1984; Thresher & Moyer, 1983). Of particular interest is color polymorphism in fish that is not linked to sex or ontogeny, but instead may represent intraspecific variation or unrecognized evolutionary partitions (Violi, Gaither, Burns, Hoelzel, & Neat, 2018; Whitney, Bowen, & Karl, 2018). Where color morphs are geographically isolated, molecular evidence often indicates recent divergence that may not relate to ecologically or behaviorally driven evolution (Drew, Allen, & Erdmann, 2010; Drew, Allen, Kaufman, & Barber, 2008; Taylor & Hellberg, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, color polymorphism has been observed within and among populations of reef fishes and has been linked to sex, life history stage, or behavior (Thresher, 1984; Thresher & Moyer, 1983). Of particular interest is color polymorphism in fish that is not linked to sex or ontogeny, but instead may represent intraspecific variation or unrecognized evolutionary partitions (Violi, Gaither, Burns, Hoelzel, & Neat, 2018; Whitney, Bowen, & Karl, 2018). Where color morphs are geographically isolated, molecular evidence often indicates recent divergence that may not relate to ecologically or behaviorally driven evolution (Drew, Allen, & Erdmann, 2010; Drew, Allen, Kaufman, & Barber, 2008; Taylor & Hellberg, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%