2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing economic feasibility of bio-energy feedstock cultivation on marginal lands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative to agricultural wastes are fast growing plants that can be grown specifically as feedstock on marginal land. Switchgrass [128] is the usual example, but bamboo and non‐food varieties of common crops such as sorghum and pearl millet are also under consideration [129] . These plants can be selected and genetically modified to facilitate processing and enhance yields.…”
Section: Biomass To Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to agricultural wastes are fast growing plants that can be grown specifically as feedstock on marginal land. Switchgrass [128] is the usual example, but bamboo and non‐food varieties of common crops such as sorghum and pearl millet are also under consideration [129] . These plants can be selected and genetically modified to facilitate processing and enhance yields.…”
Section: Biomass To Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the advantages of the cactus system is the positive return in small, planted areas (1 ha), different from that observed for other crops, such as sugarcane, which is only economically viable in areas above 51 ha [66]. Naturally, larger cactus areas would have higher returns, given that the profitability of the system should increase, due to lower logistical costs [13,67].…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The project is accepted if the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is greater than the r and rejected otherwise. This indicator guarantees that the investor obtains, at least, the required rate of return and was calculated using Equation (13).…”
Section: Economic Analysis Of the Cropping Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This matches the findings of Ajanovic [74], who stated that food prices are not influenced by feedstock production (in terms of energy crops) as long as sustainability criteria are followed. Other authors found that developing SRC on marginal land [75] and in compliance with EU institutional settings [76] can meet the demand of agricultural wood in a sustainable manner. Increasing biodiversity was found as one major non-monetary benefit in the interviews, and was also previously stated by O'Brien and Bringezu [76] to be an important factor in shifting timber extraction from biodiversity-rich forests to biodiversity-poor cropping sites.…”
Section: Social Benefits and Burdens Of Srcmentioning
confidence: 99%