2014
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing entrepreneurial and regional‐economic flood impacts on a globalized production facility

Abstract: Indirect economic losses and business interruption effects triggered by natural hazards are widely underestimated by corporate managements. They can exceed direct damages in the case of flood events and are difficult to evaluate because of missing data and methods on a micro‐scale. Existing data can be used for meso‐analysis, but are of little relevance for either mitigation policies or cost‐efficient technical mitigation measures for individual flood‐prone premises. The study represents an interdisciplinary c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They use functional fragility curves and accelerated failure time models to estimate the extent of damage to production capacity and production-affected time, including stagnation and recovery time. The study in [24] developed a semi-quantitative framework to assess the entrepreneurial and regional-economic flood impacts of one specific production facility. Their approach relies mainly on a quantitative flood hazard modelling, resulting in a detailed inundation area and water level maps for the commercial area, as well as a rather qualitative vulnerability assessment based on co-development with the company.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They use functional fragility curves and accelerated failure time models to estimate the extent of damage to production capacity and production-affected time, including stagnation and recovery time. The study in [24] developed a semi-quantitative framework to assess the entrepreneurial and regional-economic flood impacts of one specific production facility. Their approach relies mainly on a quantitative flood hazard modelling, resulting in a detailed inundation area and water level maps for the commercial area, as well as a rather qualitative vulnerability assessment based on co-development with the company.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive soil sealing across Europe (Nestroy, 2006), climate change (European Environment Agency, 2014;Loveridge et al, 2010) and extreme weather impacts (Schlögl and Laaha, 2017) challenge the resilience of transport systems, thus growing into a matter of major concern, not only because of physical damage to assets (Kellermann et al, 2015), but also due to potential overall societal losses caused by network failures and interruptions, which often far exceed infrastructure damage (Postance et al, 2017;Pfurtscheller and Vetter, 2015;Bíl et al, 2015;Pfurtscheller, 2014;Pfurtscheller and Thieken, 2013;Meyer et al, 2013). Thus, the assessment of land transport infrastructure exposure towards adverse climate events and related natural hazards is of great importance for Europe's economy, for its intermodal transport, its freight and logistics networks and for settlements in hazard-prone regions (Koetse and Rietveld, 2009;Doll et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…affecting other companies due to disruptions in the production chain. Comprehensive impact assessments that capture both, direct and indirect economic impacts, are needed to inform flood risk management [3, 4] and are increasingly demanded by decision makers [5, 6]. Relying on cost-benefit analyses that exclude indirect economic impacts may lead to sup-optimal decisions [7, 8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%