2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing ergonomic risks of software: Development of the SEAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, at the data analysis level, after validation of the acquired data by using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test and the Bartlett test, 43 we applied principal factor extraction to reduce the dimensionality of the measured anthropometric data by projecting them onto a low-dimensional subspace, where each axis (factor) is a linear combination of the initial variables (items). [44][45][46][47] To provide a convenient measurement for users, we only found one representative item from each principal factor, and then used these items for body classification. Finally, the K-means clustering method 48,49 was used to classify each body part, in which the number of classes or clusters was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA).…”
Section: Overview Of the Proposed Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, at the data analysis level, after validation of the acquired data by using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test and the Bartlett test, 43 we applied principal factor extraction to reduce the dimensionality of the measured anthropometric data by projecting them onto a low-dimensional subspace, where each axis (factor) is a linear combination of the initial variables (items). [44][45][46][47] To provide a convenient measurement for users, we only found one representative item from each principal factor, and then used these items for body classification. Finally, the K-means clustering method 48,49 was used to classify each body part, in which the number of classes or clusters was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA).…”
Section: Overview Of the Proposed Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding of anthropometric characteristics for the complex and diverse shapes of the external ears of different user populations is needed for optimizing ergonomic design. Further, the categorization of measurements is considered as an effective method to determine the factors associated with human body shapes and ergonomic risks for design, and to simplify the process of data matching for different types of products (Ball, 2011;Lacko et al, 2017;Peres et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of measurements is an effective method to associate body shapes with different types of products [12][13][14] , including principal component analysis 15 , clustering analysis [16][17][18][19] , and so on. These methods were used for generating the sizing system of products [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%