1998
DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Exposure to Violence in Urban Youth

Abstract: This study reports on the development of a structured interview, My Exposure to Violence (My ETV), that was designed to assess child and youth exposure to violence. Eighty participants between the ages of 9 and 24 were assessed. Data from My ETV were fit to a Rasch model for rating scales, a technique that generates interval level measures and allows the characterization of both chronic and acute exposure. Results indicated that the fit statistics for six scales, covering both lifetime and past year victimizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 439 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also confirm earlier evidence that while perceived and objective levels of neighborhood violence are strongly associated, they are not interchangeable. 9,12,14 Analytic sample included all CHIS 2011-2014 adolescent subjects whose addresses were accurately geocoded, who had lived at their address for ≥6 months, and whose parent or legal guardian completed the adult interview (n = 4462) b Analytic sample was identical to that for unadjusted models, but models used kernel-matched propensity scores to match Btreated^adolescents to a weighted composite of Bnon-treated^adolescents Our findings are broadly consistent with two separate bodies of research showing, on the one hand, that perceived exposure to neighborhood violence is significantly associated with youths' mental health problems, [2][3][4][5] and, on the other hand, that residing in an area with high rates of violent crime appears to have little impact on risk of depression and anxiety [16][17][18] (with a possible exception for older adults 36 ). None of these studies examined the relative impacts of both subjectivelyand objectively-measured neighborhood violence on adolescents' mental health, and many used high-risk participant samples from urban areas, so they could not rule out the possibility that inadequate variation in levels of neighborhood violence had biased their results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results also confirm earlier evidence that while perceived and objective levels of neighborhood violence are strongly associated, they are not interchangeable. 9,12,14 Analytic sample included all CHIS 2011-2014 adolescent subjects whose addresses were accurately geocoded, who had lived at their address for ≥6 months, and whose parent or legal guardian completed the adult interview (n = 4462) b Analytic sample was identical to that for unadjusted models, but models used kernel-matched propensity scores to match Btreated^adolescents to a weighted composite of Bnon-treated^adolescents Our findings are broadly consistent with two separate bodies of research showing, on the one hand, that perceived exposure to neighborhood violence is significantly associated with youths' mental health problems, [2][3][4][5] and, on the other hand, that residing in an area with high rates of violent crime appears to have little impact on risk of depression and anxiety [16][17][18] (with a possible exception for older adults 36 ). None of these studies examined the relative impacts of both subjectivelyand objectively-measured neighborhood violence on adolescents' mental health, and many used high-risk participant samples from urban areas, so they could not rule out the possibility that inadequate variation in levels of neighborhood violence had biased their results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,8 Residents' perceptions of their neighborhood's safety may be more strongly influenced by neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics than by true levels of violence. [9][10][11][12] Furthermore, self-reported measures are vulnerable to common method bias, in which personality or affective traits influence not only individuals' evaluations of their neighborhoods but also their risk of mental health problems. [13][14][15] It has historically been difficult to obtain neighborhood-level crime data, especially across multiple areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, our study would have been strengthened by adding child-reported exposure to violence as well, given that it might be more accurate than parents', especially for older youth. 82,83 Child selfreport on exposure to violence, greater detail on the timing and frequency of violence exposure, the relations between these factors and externalizing behavior, and the impact of positive socio-ecological contexts on behavior must be explored to inform intervention and programming. When combined with our current findings, these future steps would be expected to substantially advance our understanding of how much each type of exposure to violence contributes to externalizing behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 This question was administered to participating children aged 9 years and older as part of the Exposure to Violence Survey. 19,[27][28][29] Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity have been established for the English and Spanish versions of the Exposure to Violence Survey.…”
Section: Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%