2000
DOI: 10.1017/s0021963099006484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Exposure to Violence Using Multiple Informants: Application of Hierarchical Linear Model

Abstract: The present study assesses the effects of demographic risk factors on children's exposure to violence (ETV) and how these effects vary by informants. Data on exposure to violence of 9-, 12-, and 15-year-olds were collected from both child participants (N = 1880) and parents (N = 1776), as part of the assessment of the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN). A two-level hierarchical linear model (HLM) with multivariate outcomes was employed to analyze information obtained from these two d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous research on exposure to violence in which parents report their children having lower levels of exposure compared to children’s self-reported exposure (Goodman, De Los Reyes, & Bradshaw, 2010; Kuo, Mohler, Raudenbush, & Earls, 2000), and with teachers having perceptions of lower levels of student victimization compared to students’ perceptions (e.g., Stockdale et al, 2002; Wienke Totura et al, 2009). Stockdale and colleagues (2002) also reported no differences between parents and teachers on the extent of bullying, whereas our study found that parents perceived schools as being slightly safer compared to school staff.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is consistent with previous research on exposure to violence in which parents report their children having lower levels of exposure compared to children’s self-reported exposure (Goodman, De Los Reyes, & Bradshaw, 2010; Kuo, Mohler, Raudenbush, & Earls, 2000), and with teachers having perceptions of lower levels of student victimization compared to students’ perceptions (e.g., Stockdale et al, 2002; Wienke Totura et al, 2009). Stockdale and colleagues (2002) also reported no differences between parents and teachers on the extent of bullying, whereas our study found that parents perceived schools as being slightly safer compared to school staff.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Blending parent reports of exposure for younger children and self-reports for older children is not optimal, although reporter (child or parent) appeared not to matter in our data. 4 Future studies should utilize multiple converging sources of information on children’s experiences, especially given findings suggesting that parents and children can differ in systematic ways in their reports of children’s exposure (Kuo, Mohler, Raudenbush, & Earls, 2000). Another measurement-related limitation arises from the uneven number of items used in the scales measuring exposure to violence, and the fact that in two cases—children’s self-report of severe physical aggression and exposure to inter-ethnic community violence—internal consistency reliability was somewhat low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The My Exposure to Violence scale (MyETV; Kindlon, Wright, Raudenbush, & Earls, 1996; Kuo, Mohler, Raudenbush, & Earls, 2000; Selner et al, 1998), which is a modified version of the Survey of Exposure to Community Violence (Richters & Martinez, 1993), was administered to youth at wave 1. Using data from this measure, we created a single binary measure of exposure to life threatening violence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%