2001
DOI: 10.1136/jramc-147-03-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Exposures in the United Kingdom’s Armed Forces - A Review of Systems that Collect Data Useful for Exposure Assessment

Abstract: The ability to assess the exposure of individuals or groups is a critical element in any effective health surveillance system, as it provides the opportunity to identify the causes of ill health, the levels of exposure resulting in ill health and, through controlling exposures, to protect the health of Service personnel. As part of a wider programme to enhance the health surveillance capabilities of the Defence Medical Services, a project was undertaken to assess the collection and retention of data for exposu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual-level exposures may be recorded inconsistently, or not at all, (Cherry et al 2001) except where statutorily required. (Capleton et al 2001) Two earlier exposures of military personnel to potential haematopoietic/lymphopoietic harm raised widespread concerns; the exposure of many thousands of UK, US and other Service personnel to ionising radiation in the course of the nuclear tests which took place between 1952 and 1967, (Roff 2002, Muirhead et al 2003 and the exposure of a large number of US personnel and a smaller number of New Zealand and others to the dioxin-containing defoliant Agent Orange during the Vietnam War. (Frumkin 2003) As UK personnel were not involved in the latter exposure, Agent Orange will not be further considered in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual-level exposures may be recorded inconsistently, or not at all, (Cherry et al 2001) except where statutorily required. (Capleton et al 2001) Two earlier exposures of military personnel to potential haematopoietic/lymphopoietic harm raised widespread concerns; the exposure of many thousands of UK, US and other Service personnel to ionising radiation in the course of the nuclear tests which took place between 1952 and 1967, (Roff 2002, Muirhead et al 2003 and the exposure of a large number of US personnel and a smaller number of New Zealand and others to the dioxin-containing defoliant Agent Orange during the Vietnam War. (Frumkin 2003) As UK personnel were not involved in the latter exposure, Agent Orange will not be further considered in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure assessments a challenge in military health research, 21 and most studies still rely heavily on self‐reported exposure data, which is of course subject to recall bias. Ability to accurately and objectively assess the exposure(s) of individuals or groups is a critical element of health surveillance, as it provides the opportunity to assess the level of exposure that results in ill‐health 22 . Exposure data to environmental hazards and specific incidents are collected by the ADF and are available to the DHSP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some forms of pay data provide the strength of a built-in feedback mechanism whereby both personnel and the employer are motivated to correct pay errors as soon as possible ( 47 ). However, differential retention of personnel data by rank and service has also been noted, with the potential to bias retrospective studies of exposure-effect relationships since exposures may differ across these factors ( 49 ).…”
Section: Exposure Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%