Assessing Extension of Time Application in Malaysian Construction Industry: Views from Professionals

Yusuwan, Norazian Mohamad; Adnan, Hamimah

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.007

Cited by 6 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…APvAB method compares the planned activities (baseline) with the as-built activities, and as such, it requires a baseline and an as-built schedule or as-built records. Yusuwan and Adnan (2013) describe it as the most preferred method as it is simple and produces fair and reasonable results. SCL (2015) and SCL (2017) recommended using this method in windows when performing the analysis distant from the event.…”

Section: A Review Of Delay Analysis Methods (Dams)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The surprising fact was that the IAP method, although highly criticised by the researchers and rejected by clients (Yang and Kao 2009;Yusuwan and Adnan 2013), was still commonly used and believed to be effective in at least one of the projects.…”

Section: Further Analysis Of the Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This finding is in line with the observation suggested by Mohan and Al-Gahtani (2006). Similarly, the APvAB method was used in one of the projects, and as suggested by Arditi and Pattanakitchamroon (2006), Yusuwan and Adnan (2013) and Williams (2003), it was not successful because it was not a preferred method and clients had doubts about its utility and outcome. SCL 2017and Nelson and Livengood (2017) explained that an enhanced version of the APvAB method, which is done in widows, may overcome he issues within the APvAB.…”

Section: Further Analysis Of the Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the interviewed project planners expressed their view that IAP method should be used when appropriate, particularly when the analysis is from the contractor's perspective. This area may need further practical investigation, as the researchers such as Arditi and Pattanakitchamroon (2006), Braimah and Ndekugri (2008), Yang and Kao (2009) and Yusuwan and Adnan (2013) generally criticise the use of IAP method. SCL (2017) stated that the IAP has material limitations as it does not consider actual progress or change in sequence.…”

Section: Further Analysis Of the Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methods in construction projects in UAE

Abdelhadi¹,

Dulaimi

Bajracharya

2018

International Journal of Construction Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the Leeds Beckett Repository is to provide open access to our research, as required by funder policies and permitted by publishers and copyright law. The Leeds Beckett repository holds a wide range of publications, each of which has been checked for copyright and the relevant embargo period has been applied by the Research Services team. We operate on a standard take-down policy. If you are the author or publisher of an output and you would like it removed from the repository, please contact us and we will investigate on a case-by-case basis.

show abstract

Section: A Review Of Delay Analysis Methods (Dams)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Further Analysis Of the Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Further Analysis Of the Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Further Analysis Of the Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methods in construction projects in UAE

Abdelhadi¹,

Dulaimi

Bajracharya

2018

International Journal of Construction Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Concurrent delay was found to be the most contentious issue associated with EoT claims. They (Yusuwan and Adnan, 2013b) submitted in another investigation that poor submission of claims by contractor (such as lack of details and particulars), late submission of claims by the contractor, and collection of relevant facts from site records to establish the principle of the claim ranked highest by the respondent as reasons for late assessment of EoT claim in the Malaysian construction industry. Further studies of claims in the Malaysian construction industry (Bakhary et al 2015), revealed that the highest three reasons for claim in ranking orders were:…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rank-Order Analysis of Factors Causing Claims on Road Construction Projects in Botswana

Adeyemi

Segwabe

2016

japiv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Claims are considered to be one of the most serious disruptive forces to successful project delivery in the construction industry. In a small developing economy like Botswana, it is germane to identify the sources and the frequency of occurrence of claims so that the burden of project cost overrun, a hallmark of the country’s construction industry is substantially reduced. Detailed literature review and preliminary field investigations were used to identify causes of claims related to road construction projects. The study identified six major types of claim and twenty seven causes of claims. Using questionnaire as research instrument, respondents (construction industry major stakeholders i.e. clients, consultants and contractors) were asked to rank the frequency of occurrence of the types and causes of claims in road construction projects on a Likert-type scale. Relative importance index (RII) method was used to analyze the data collected from the questionnaire survey. The analysis was carried out for each group of respondents and on the overall results (all the parties combined). A total of 27 useful responses made up of nine clients, ten consultants and eight contractors) were analyzed. Findings indicated that the clients and consultants specified delay claims followed by extra work claims were the most frequent type of claims in the construction of roads in Botswana. Contractors perceived differing site conditions followed by delay claims as the most frequent type of claims. From the overall response, delay claims were ranked first followed by extra work claims. Acceleration claims were ranked least. The top five most frequent causes of claims based on overall ranking were: variation in quantities, design errors, poor site management and supervision by contractor, ineffective planning and scheduling of project by contractor, and low price of contract due to high competition. Construction industry research in Botswana has never looked into the issue of claims and yet it is one of the hidden sources of construction project failure in the country. It is perceived that hedging against the most adverse causes of claims will stem the tide of incessant cost overrun, litigation and project abandonment on road projects in Botswana.

show abstract

BIM-based claims management system: A centralized information repository for extension of time claims

Ali

Zahoor

Nasir

et al. 2020

Automation in Construction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessing Extension of Time Application in Malaysian Construction Industry: Views from Professionals

Cited by 6 publications

References 13 publications

Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methods in construction projects in UAE

Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methods in construction projects in UAE

Rank-Order Analysis of Factors Causing Claims on Road Construction Projects in Botswana

BIM-based claims management system: A centralized information repository for extension of time claims

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About