In the light of the industry's recent refocus on disaggregation mission areas of highly complex, large cost, and subsequently, risk adverse space systems, much attention has been placed on the option of employing hosted payloads to realize the vision of increasing system and mission resiliency, reduction of cost, and increase of launch opportunities. Oftentimes, dedicated rideshare is discarded quickly by the industry due to many issues, such as large complexity in mission integration for rideshares, large perceived risk to the launch vehicle (LV) and primary space vehicle (SV) providers, lack of viable launch opportunities, as well as a launch price point that is higher than the current rideshare user market can bear. Further, the paper provides the results of a careful study on advantages and disadvantages of Government payloads hosted on commercial spacecraft and dedicated rideshares of auxiliary spacecraft based on industry discussion and corporate experience. The paper presents side-by-side comparisons of the pros and cons of employing hosted payloads versus dedicated rideshare by itself, as well as versus dedicated rideshare employing the FANTMRiDE™ system, highlighting the institutional barriers that prohibit widespread adoption of each option. Further, this paper presents how the FANTM-RiDE system addresses these issues to greatly facilitate mission integration while dramatically reducing risk to the LV, primary SV, and rideshare SVs, simultaneously driving launch costs for rideshares to a level that would encourage the industry to regularly employ this method of launching smallsats. The FANTM-RiDE system removes many of these barriers by providing "phantom-like" transparency to the LV and SV Primes through a set of technical, programmatic and integration solutions. The paper will provide a clear picture for the US space industry how FANTM-RiDE will create an environment to optimize the use of available mass and payload fairing margins on US missions.