Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy and Imaging VII 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2527150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing extracerebral signal contamination in optical measurements of cerebral blood flow and oxygenation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another potential source of error with optical neuromonitoring methods is the effect of scalp contamination. The influence of the scalp is considerably less in infants compared with adults, and within this study its effects were mitigated using appropriate source-detector distances for B-NIRS (SDD = 3 cm) and DCS (SDD = 2 cm) [54]. An additional source of signal contamination unique to hydrocephalus is possible light loss in the enlarged ventricle as the cortical mantle becomes increasingly thin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Another potential source of error with optical neuromonitoring methods is the effect of scalp contamination. The influence of the scalp is considerably less in infants compared with adults, and within this study its effects were mitigated using appropriate source-detector distances for B-NIRS (SDD = 3 cm) and DCS (SDD = 2 cm) [54]. An additional source of signal contamination unique to hydrocephalus is possible light loss in the enlarged ventricle as the cortical mantle becomes increasingly thin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the simulations, the true optical pathlength was known; however, in the two-layer phantom experiments, the optical pathlength was estimated using the water peak in the second derivative of the CW reflectance data and corrected with the time-point-specific spectral shape of the TR pathlength. Since the TR pathlength was obtained using mean TOF, which is susceptible to surface contamination, 27 , 28 it is unlikely that the spectral shape of the TR pathlength changed as much as the spectral shape of the CW pathlength with oxygenation changes in the bottom layer. By not fully accounting for the changes in pathlength with changes in absorption, changes in chromophore concentrations may be underestimated in the CW analysis as a result of cross talk with the pathlength 13 , 82 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As anticipated, the CW approach performed the worst when estimating ΔHb and ΔoxCCO in the bottom layer from the surface of the two-layer phantoms, substantially underestimating the changes in chromophore concentrations. This was anticipated given that the probes were placed atop a 10 mm thick static surface layer and previous studies have shown that the CW-NIRS signal in the adult head is dominated by ECL contributions 27 29 Since the concentrations changed only in the bottom layer while the top layer remained static, it was expected that CW would underestimate the changes in the bottom layer due to contamination by the top layer (partial volume effect) 72 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations