2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.594830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Fine-Granularity Structural and Functional Connectivity in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, results showed that ReHo values for the two Mnl I variant genotypic groups differed in the mPFC of boys with ADHD. Previous studies revealed functional abnormalities in children with ADHD (Shanmugan et al., 2016 ; Wang et al., 2020 ). For example, Zhou et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, results showed that ReHo values for the two Mnl I variant genotypic groups differed in the mPFC of boys with ADHD. Previous studies revealed functional abnormalities in children with ADHD (Shanmugan et al., 2016 ; Wang et al., 2020 ). For example, Zhou et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Importantly, results showed that ReHo values for the two MnlI variant genotypic groups differed in the mPFC of boys with ADHD. Previous studies revealed functional abnormalities in children with ADHD (Shanmugan et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2020). For example, Zhou et al (2018) found that these children had significantly lower ReHo values for the right middle frontal gyrus, thereby implying fewer spontaneous neuronal activities in this region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Further, changes in GWC have been associated with cognitive performance among AD individuals with underlying β-Amyloit pathology and with increased age among individuals with dementia (Salat et al 2009;Xu et al 2024). Changes in GWC have not only been observed among older clinical populations but also among young children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Wang et al 2023). Further, GWC is suggested to capture microstructural changes before the emergence of cortical atrophy and be more sensitive to capturing these microstructural changes earlier than conventional neuroimaging parameters (Xu et al 2024;Putcha et al 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GWC might not be a sensitive neural marker for capturing differences in risk populations with relatively low risk. However, studies measuring GWC in different clinical populations have demonstrated that GWC is a sensitive marker for capturing illness-related changes (Putcha et al 2023;Salat et al 2009;Xu et al 2024;Wang et al 2023). Studies have found GWC to be sensitive to capturing β-amyloid pathology in earlier stages of Alzheimer's disorder (AD) (Putcha et al 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, as the major modeling of SGCP is formulated in a self-supervised scheme, we are testing its capability to perform subregion parcellation, investigating the unique structural-functional characteristics of the fine-grained compositions in certain brain regions, such as the entorhinal cortex, where preliminary studies have shown the presence of subregion with distinguished connectivity patterns in different cortical pathways [ 32 , 33 ]. Finally, while in this study SGCP is used to analyze structural connectivity patterns derived from DWI images, it can be applied to functional connectivity derived from fMRI or MEG/EEG data [ 34 , 35 ], formulating a structural-functional parcellation framework [ 36 ]. Further, rich information can be encoded in the node features, including morphological features derived from T1 imaging, pathological and proteinopathies features derived from PET imaging, as well as genetic features derived from microarrays.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%