2012
DOI: 10.1080/14794802.2012.734969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing ‘functionality’ in school mathematics examinations: what does being human have to do with it?

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Valid assessment of similar learning intentions also proved a challenge in England, for example in the 'functional skills' element piloted within the GCSE. Drake et al (2012) show that assessment in this area is often artificial or contrived. However, use of pre-release materials provides an opportunity for teachers to help candidates navigate what might be asked, and what is relevant mathematically and contextually.…”
Section: Locating Core Mathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valid assessment of similar learning intentions also proved a challenge in England, for example in the 'functional skills' element piloted within the GCSE. Drake et al (2012) show that assessment in this area is often artificial or contrived. However, use of pre-release materials provides an opportunity for teachers to help candidates navigate what might be asked, and what is relevant mathematically and contextually.…”
Section: Locating Core Mathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well known recent examples include Andrew Noyes' work on mathematical pathways, which included a substantive assessment component (e.g. Drake, Wake, & Noyes, 2012), and Candia Morgan's work on the evolution of GCSE test questions (e.g. Morgan & Sfard, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%