18"Despite women earning similar numbers of graduate degrees as men in STEM disciplines, they 19" are underrepresented in upper level positions in both academia and industry. Editorial board 20" memberships are an important example of such positions; membership is both a professional 21" honor in recognition of achievement and an opportunity for professional advancement. We 22" surveyed 10 highly regarded journals in environmental biology, natural resource management, 23"and plant sciences to quantify the number of women on their editorial boards and in positions of 24" editorial leadership from 1985-2013. We found that during this time period, only 16% of 25" editorial board members were women, with more pronounced disparities in positions of editorial 26" leadership (i.e., Associate Editors, Editors-in-Chief). Although the trend was towards 27" improvement over time, there was surprising variation between journals. We argue editorial 28" boards should strive for gender parity to increase the number of women afforded the 29" opportunities and benefits that accompany membership, as well as increase the number of role 30" models and mentors for early-career scientists and students.
31"PeerJ PrePrints | http://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.369v2 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access |