2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.04.446899
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing genome-wide dynamic changes in enhancer activity during early mESC differentiation by FAIRE-STARR-seq

Abstract: Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can differentiate into any given cell type and therefore represent a versatile model to study the link between gene regulation and differentiation. To quantitatively assess the dynamics of enhancer activity during the early stages of murine ESC differentiation, we analyzed accessible genomic regions using STARR-seq, a massively parallel reporter assay. This resulted in a genome-wide quantitative map of active mESC enhancers, in pluripotency and during the early stages of differentia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study in mouse embryonic stem cells made the same observation using an orthogonal approach, suggesting this phenomenon is present in other mammalian species (Glaser et al 2021). We note that a small percentage of accessible peaks (4.4%) contain both active and silent regions, demonstrating that there can be competing regulatory regions within the same accessible peak.…”
Section: Atac-starr-seq Quantifies Regulatory Activity Of Open Chromatinsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study in mouse embryonic stem cells made the same observation using an orthogonal approach, suggesting this phenomenon is present in other mammalian species (Glaser et al 2021). We note that a small percentage of accessible peaks (4.4%) contain both active and silent regions, demonstrating that there can be competing regulatory regions within the same accessible peak.…”
Section: Atac-starr-seq Quantifies Regulatory Activity Of Open Chromatinsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…To narrow the scope of the assay, recent methods have combined STARR-seq with techniques that capture accessible chromatin to specifically test the regulatory potential of accessible DNA (Buenrostro et al 2013;Wang et al 2018;Chaudhri et al 2020;Glaser et al 2021). As a result, these methods only sample a fraction of the human genome (~2%) while assaying nearly all regulatory elements capable of driving transcription endogenously, because they are derived from open chromatin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the majority of accessible DNA has no regulatory potential in this context or, alternatively, that ATAC-STARR-seq is not sensitive enough to measure weakly active or weakly silent regions. A recent study in mouse embryonic stem cells made the same observation using an orthogonal approach, suggesting this phenomenon is preserved in other mammalian species (Glaser et al 2021). Interestingly, a small percentage of accessible peaks (4.4%) contain both active and silent regions, demonstrating that there can be competing regulatory regions within the same accessible peak.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…To narrow the scope of STARR-seq while assaying nearly all endogenously active regulatory elements, recent methods, such as assay for transposase-accessible chromatin coupled to STARR-seq (ATAC-STARR-seq), have combined STARR-seq with assays that capture accessible chromatin to extract and specifically assay the regulatory potential of accessible DNA (Buenrostro et al 2013; Wang et al 2018; Chaudhri et al 2020; Glaser et al 2021). In this way, these assays only sample a fraction of the human genome (∼2%) while assaying nearly all regulatory elements capable of driving transcription endogenously, because they are derived from open chromatin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess and quantify reproducibility for STARR-seq based studies, we systematically compared 24 studies 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,30,26,31,33,32,40,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50 that performed STARRseq experiments on mammalian or Drosophila cells (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Box 2: Reproducibility Across Starr-seq Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%