“…[9] However, in the literature, there are solutions to this problem: (a) inorganic mercury is most likely to come in exogenously, whereas organic mercury endogenously [15,16] ; (b) examination of the distribution of the chemical element across a cross section of a hair, as well as of the concentration gradient along its length, may indicate the nature of the element income. [17,18] When some additional sources of information of Hg content in the organism (such as bones and teeth) are presented in the archeological site, the lifetime and postmortem influences can be separated, using thoroughly analysis of all material, as was done in the work of S. Pessanha et al (2016), for example. [19] In our case, we have got 40 plates of hair belonging to different people.…”