2010
DOI: 10.5194/tc-4-313-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing high altitude glacier thickness, volume and area changes using field, GIS and remote sensing techniques: the case of Nevado Coropuna (Peru)

Abstract: Abstract. Higher temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns have induced an acute decrease in Andean glaciers, thus leading to additional stress on water supply. To adapt to climate changes, local governments need information on the rate of glacier area and volume losses and on current ice thickness. Remote sensing analyses of Coropuna glacier (Peru) delineate an acute glaciated area decline between 1955 and 2008. We tested how volume changes can be estimated with remote sensing and GIS techniques usin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
2
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
50
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Gorokhovich and Voustianiouk, 2006;Racoviteanu et al, 2007;Peduzzi et al, 2010). The reason for that is to be able to follow and understand individual error terms, and to decide individually on their correction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Gorokhovich and Voustianiouk, 2006;Racoviteanu et al, 2007;Peduzzi et al, 2010). The reason for that is to be able to follow and understand individual error terms, and to decide individually on their correction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for that is to be able to follow and understand individual error terms, and to decide individually on their correction. Furthermore, it will become clear why a multiple regression based upon some combination of these terrain parameters will be significant, though such a correction may not be geometrically appropriate (e.g., see Peduzzi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is the result of topographic complexity below the resolution of the sensor, radar geometry considerations (layover, foreshortening, and shadowing), and interferometric phase unwrapping errors, all most pronounced in steep mountains. Such terrain biases are demonstrated in the SRTM-C with elevation (Berthier et al, 2006;Paul, 2008), slope and aspect (Gorokhovich and Voustian-15 iouk, 2006;Van Niel et al, 2008;Peduzzi et al, 2010;Shortridge and Messina, 2011), and resolution (manifested in curvature) (Gardelle et al, 2012), and in the TanDEM-X with only slope (Purinton and Bookhagen, 2017;Wessel et al, 2018). Terrain slope-also related to relief (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%