2010
DOI: 10.1175/2009jhm1160.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Hydrologic Impact of Climate Change with Uncertainty Estimates: Bayesian Neural Network Approach

Abstract: A major challenge in assessing the hydrologic effect of climate change remains the estimation of uncertainties associated with different sources, such as the global climate models, emission scenarios, downscaling methods, and hydrologic models. There is a demand for an efficient and easy-to-use rainfall-runoff modeling tool that can capture the different sources of uncertainties to generate future flow simulations that can be used for decision making. To manage the large range of uncertainties in the climate c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Climate model uncertainty has become a major focus for downscaling research: according to both Scopus and WoS this topic accounts for over 20% of published output since 1993 (and ∼25% of all SDSM outputs). Studies typically quantify uncertainties arising from permutations of emission scenario, GCM, downscaling technique, and impacts model (Wilby and Harris, 2006;Dibike et al, 2008;Prudhomme and Davies, 2009;Khan and Coulibaly, 2010;Chen et al, 2011). The trend in downscaling research is towards more exhaustive analysis of uncertainty (Harding et al, 2012), something which presents SDSM-users with a dilemma since only a few forcing scenarios are provided through the CCCSN portal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate model uncertainty has become a major focus for downscaling research: according to both Scopus and WoS this topic accounts for over 20% of published output since 1993 (and ∼25% of all SDSM outputs). Studies typically quantify uncertainties arising from permutations of emission scenario, GCM, downscaling technique, and impacts model (Wilby and Harris, 2006;Dibike et al, 2008;Prudhomme and Davies, 2009;Khan and Coulibaly, 2010;Chen et al, 2011). The trend in downscaling research is towards more exhaustive analysis of uncertainty (Harding et al, 2012), something which presents SDSM-users with a dilemma since only a few forcing scenarios are provided through the CCCSN portal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extra hidden neurons raise the network's ability to extract higherorder statistics from (input) data. Furthermore a network is said to be fully connected if every node in each layer of the network is connected to every other node in the adjacent forward layer (Khan and Coulibaly, 2010). The network "learns" by adjusting the interconnections (called weights) between layers.…”
Section: Feed Forward Back Propagation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of precipitation spatially and temporally directly affects the hydrological cycle within a watershed, altering flow regimes and complicating the accurate predictions of flow (Das et al 2008;Boyer et al 2010;Coulibaly 2006;Khan and Coulibaly 2010;Liu and Cui 2011;Trenouth et al 2013;Thompson et al 2016). An understanding of precipitation variability is also needed for flood and drought preparedness planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%