2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing individual sow risk factors for coliform mastitis: A case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Obstetric aid was more frequently given in sows diagnosed with mastitis, metritis and agalactia [ 57 ], coliform mastitis [ 58 ] and post-farrowing discharge [ 59 ], but the significance of the parturition duration in PDS is obscure [ 4 , 50 , 57 ]. Whether extended parturition and increased obstetric aid cause PDS or vice versa remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obstetric aid was more frequently given in sows diagnosed with mastitis, metritis and agalactia [ 57 ], coliform mastitis [ 58 ] and post-farrowing discharge [ 59 ], but the significance of the parturition duration in PDS is obscure [ 4 , 50 , 57 ]. Whether extended parturition and increased obstetric aid cause PDS or vice versa remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies demonstrated that prevalence of mastitis in sows was about 13% [2] and it was about 25.5% in lactating heifers in Dutch [3]. For swine, acute clinical mastitis was reported to be associated with reduced piglet growth and survival [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es herrscht Einigkeit darüber, dass MMA eine multifaktorielle Erkrankung ist. Neben der bakteriellen Genese müssen auch andere Faktoren in Betracht gezogen werden, welche mit Ernährung, Unterbringung, Management und Betreuung in Zusammenhang stehen (Martineau et al, 1992;Gerjets et al, 2011 ( Jensen et al, 2004). In der deskriptiven Statistik fielen Variablen auf, die einen signifikanten P-Wert zeigten, bei denen es aber jeweils in Gruppe P oder K keine Nennungen (n= 0) gab.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified